4.16.2016

it was and was not


|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| signal wave  ~  blurring in  that radio second phrase over air-wave




 t'was my uncle uncole mon oncle ecole what studied with Deleuze attending the lectures at Vincennes
    
            not i  not i                                       no   t                I   ,   but ever' thing is fiction      ~  




 O is it now  
                                                  oh yes  everyth ing but suffering for that  we need      !~  



_____________


4.05.2016

re Agent Swarm has been Banned! amazing now a group piglets ban a thinker? ......' page by a tribunal of Laruelleans (with no right of reply, as I was already banned).

________________________




re ban a thinker? ......' page by a tribunal of Laruelleans (with no right of reply, as I was already banned).

 what's astonishing in this situation whatever the merits or not of the argument underway is the action
of banishment

  how it ends the process of thought  and piles up a moat of shit between the brain

                          and the currency of thought

                               the electric power of its emergence  indeed its emergency 




___________MOna and the girls  are appalled and applaud Agent Swarm for standing up to a group


                                         of what are,  essentially, non existing non thinkers thinkers



  why not existing?  you might be asking yourself?   Ah, that's elementary dear   , rudimentary   for the moment



you ban

  a thinker,

                          thinking's stopped, halted, dead in its tracks    .

Mona and the girls of schizo thinking shit on these dead-beats and calamitous losers and non thinkers
  
  the 'tribunal' the 'court of judgment' already says much about  the failure of those who enact such behaviour in 21st thought,

      i n the end ,  it is they who shall evaporate    ,

                             

___________________________________________

"________Cutupidité: Becoming-Radically-Stupid a report to an academy II_"



Zafer Aracagäk
Istanbul Bilgi University


[1] This report was written before. [1]
[2] It was written to an academy.
[3] Considering the urgency of the renewal of this report, I have almost decided to write another report to the academy – the richest, the noblest, the most famous, and the most universal academy.
[4] Therefore, at the cost of ridiculing myself, even at the cost of making a fool out of myself, for the first time in my life I will leave behind my stupidity and, thereby, I will show an attempt at outlining my suggestion to you, to all of you – except animals, plants, and rocks – that is, becoming-radically-stupid.
[5] In my attempt, I know I have to be sincere and therefore I will start with a new tool – an assemblage of sorts – in order to draw a sharp line of distinction between me and you. What I dare to call "cutupidité" [2] is actually made of two words: "cut-up" and "stupidité" the joint form of which should be reminding you three mentors I had as I was passing through the stages of my stupidity.
[6] Let me introduce first the preliminary conditions of my concept:
  1. Cutupidité is a discontinuous plane of consistency resisting any plane of immanence.
  2. Cutupidité is a non-organic rhizome made of multi-dimensional, infinite cuts where each cut lays bare an unique event which cannot be repeated.
  3. Cutupidité is the art of hyperbole where each negation of space triggers an aerial fugue, completely non-traceable.
  4. Cutupidité is not serial but aerial; actually it is an aerial fugue, which, soaring above the surface of the rhizome, traverses each and every cut inflicted on it.
  5. Cutupidité is to become-spectral without coordinates; it is not becoming-immaterial but becoming-gaseous.
  6. Cutupidité is Cotard delusion: le délire de négation – to demolish the dimensional with a discontinuous multiplicity of dimensions so as to open up a psychasthenic frontground.
  7. Cutupidité is Contigentia absoluta (potentiality without will): state zero of wanting, failure before failure.
  8. Cutupidité is the affirmation of paranoia as a form of extreme wakefulness.
  9. Cutupidité is suicidal in content and disastrous in form.
  10. Cutupidité is the smoke of the cliché and the last breath of wisdom.
  11. Cutupidité is to know all the styles but appropriating none.
  12. Cutupidité is the "instinct d'abandon" vs "élan vital".
  13. Cutupidité is infinite dividuation.
  14. Cutupidité is to be done with anthropocentrism.
  15. Cutupidité is incorporation of stupidité.

-------------------------------------------------------

Cutupidité: Becoming-Radically-Stupid a report to an academy II

________________________


Agent Swarm has been Banned! amazing now a group piglets ban a thinker? ......' page by a tribunal of Laruelleans (with no right of reply, as I was already banned).


___________________   athinker has been Banned -------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two years later I must conclude that my fear was well-founded and that the habits of scholasticism have triumphed. I have met with the same pattern of ignoring, then condescending to, then ostracising alternative approaches with which another participant in the discussion over non-philosophy, Adrián Romero Farías, was “welcomed” by people who now wax lyrical about “pluralism” and “democracy” on every possible occasion.
Adrián Romero Farías put forward an hypothesis, that the professed opinions and values of the Laruelleans were a case of “false radicality” and that
“in the case of non-philosophy, it seems to be founded in a sort of lack of effectuation of epistemological ruptures, which is to say it only enunciates these ruptures as part of its text, but not as an ethical work of scholastic de-subjectivification, deterritorialization etc”.

This hypothesis of the continued pursuit of dogmatic and exclusive academic mores has been confirmed over and over again during the last two years, culminating, in my case, in my being banned from the official François Laruelle group and being denigrated on that page by a tribunal of Laruelleans (with no right of reply, as I was already banned).

_________________
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Perhaps the replyrequires banning the banners? 'depress' the depressors?
do the banners really exist?

__________________ what is a ban?  a banishment  ...

                      ex ile  ___ put out of the 

                          \\ refused entry 
                           || no more discussion permitted.


                      a little church going goeers doing this?

                           old story new names
                    __________________

________________________

3.18.2016

Schopenhauer 's rebuke ... of Hegel and quoting Shakespeare along the way ‘such stuff as madmen tongue and brain not’.

______________________________________________________



_______________“In every page of David Hume, there is more to be learned than from Hegel's, Herbart's and Schleiermacher's complete philosophical works.”
 


―Arthur Schopenhauer
___

Hegel, installed from above, by the powers that be, as the certified Great Philosopher, was a flat-headed, insipid, nauseating, illiterate charlatan, who reached the pinnacle of audacity in scribbling together and dishing up the craziest mystifying nonsense. This nonsense has been noisily proclaimed as immortal wisdom by mercenary followers and readily accepted as such by all fools, who thus joined into as perfect a chorus of admiration as had ever been heard before. The extensive field of spiritual influence with which Hegel was furnished by those in power has enabled him to achieve the intellectual corruption of a whole generation.


_______________ 


Badiou and his minion Zizek would do well to read this
and forget this nonsense they re still spewing in one book after another.
 and this goes for their thousands on thousands of minions

'
But the height of audacity in serving up pure nonsense, in stringing together senseless and extravagant mazes of words, such as had previously been known only in madhouses, was finally reached in Hegel, and became the instrument of the most barefaced general mystification that has ever taken place, with a result which will appear fabulous to posterity, and will remain as a monument to German stupidity.




Arthur Schopenhauer, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, trans. Haldane-Kemp (The World as Will and Idea, vol. 2), London: Kegan Paul, p. 22.

_______________

And there's the wonderful Kierkegaard's polemics against Mister Hegel and company 

 And Nietzsche's but of course Badiou and his creepy eyes have not read Nietzsche
  Nor has Zizzek

 because when he reads Lacan's got his brains up his arse      .

______________________the castratros of thought   


_________________________( o of course they've read him ha! but it's reduced to pulp)


which is not to suggest there's nothing of value in Hegel and his imitators ziZeki and Bad IO  
U  You but it's not where you think it is.

it's not even where they think it is !

How would either of them know 

whence their own value


when neither has a nose ?

One needs a nose  for philosophy

 otherwise the stink   wld. escape one...


and that's a paraphrase of dear dead Nietzsche himself  
_______________________________________________________
 
 and while I am at let's demystify all of this nonsense about the word betise as used by Deleuze and others ... there's nothing mystical or special or holy about it

it means stupid 
                                           and it was used in the same sense by Tristan Tzara
in his 1918 manifesto

                                 which also made short  work  of dialectics and  the hegelian posturing of pompous war-makers  ....

 if people like to spend months banging their empty skulls over a  word

    and give it pretentious airs  as if it's sense was so utterly different that it 

cannot be found in English then their baboons and fools

           if was good enough for Shakespeare it's good enough for translating Deleuze .

these  thinkers who want to drag everyone's head through the dust ... derrida and his followers going on an on about 

  'la betise and le betise' ___________________its shameful and 
                 
                                                                         (blablah they go on and on as if it was back to the sacrosanct of theology!)

          underhanded    ____  after all Deleuze himself stated that Anglo American literature was superior...

                   and if it's superior then the langauge is good enough to be so and to translate

  the   words from   french ...

 besides everyone knows that translating always means comprise or betraying to some extent ...

   so let live well enough       

                and get on with what's important....

otherwise no one will get any work done......

and remember in A thousand Plateaus   Deleuze and Guattari say there's nothing to argue 

about one word can be replaced by another... i.e.  betise stupidity     ...a ll fine and good .

 i think they use the term anexact to get across this sense of what they're saying...

it's philosophy not poetry...

__________________________




___________________

3.10.2016

re A desert island that was deserted and forgotten what it was about? a little shitty ..



_____________________________________________


_______________________________________

but its's Uff incorhenets? uffs were no place to say

no place to say

 _______________________________

Do you remember what that was over?
Not at all I know you ambled around the circuit of the total moon long enough to go crazy.

an  that was deserted and forgotten what it was about? a little shitty ..

  at time  it's just the elegance of the thing makes it interesting
  not dividing or conquering but just having the wiry tangle of it's enough to
turning it around like a  player pen  .

____________

A desert island that was deserted and forgotten what it was about? a little shitty ..

__________________________________________________


It's a wonder to see the Z of creation
  having it out with the C of what? R for rights?

  ________________  To mock Der. and dismiss Lc is one thing

                                 doing so in  a playful matter

  the problem Mister C , has always been he argues from a postion of what he imagines is 'right' and thus
 universalizes his perspective

     in effect he's doing what he accuses the Empire builders of  A of doing!

  it's quite comical

    the differences between the two can already been seen in the discussion that took place
  decades ago between Fou and C    ~
      its two different epistemologies at work

                                                            __ Different and  and not the same


--- I f   I was going to a desert island w ith no choice of what to read
  I would surely take Z
           over  C


                                      

2.19.2016

if philosophy









 if philosophy's not cut up what is it? if it's not becomings that aren't cut up it's hegelian hegelian cut up becoming
 a totality of history topped by its double s  ides              looking forward and backward?


 the hidden word with in  a word

what's becomings philosophy

 philosophy becomings hegel



 okay okay

            'but if you're not breaking through it's nothing '


  the century was   deleuzian                                    was                       was    

we've moved on now

   what is now then    th                    en  ? the ens of 
                                            metaphysics?


Heidegger in the backyard                   book     burning
                                                  1972



2.08.2016

re, Co-author ... would have been 91 and

___________



  it's not dying or dead or could have would have  as that'd 


                                                  also mean or refer to Having and philosophy's not Having anything

        


                                       it's not about Having it's about mooring and moving and thinking for yourself somewhere else to go

 R  Co-author Co-Author Co-Author Co-Author of Anti-Oedipus, would have been 91 and




_________________So Mona heard the moon and start of shrouded tent rivers beckoning her song of 

                              love and health



_________________________

1.29.2016

1.20.2016

.. Craving... caring .. repressing...A comically (FUn!) succinct view of Felix Guattari and Gilles D's first co-authored book AntiOedipus................

_____________________________                                                       

                   Do We Crave Fascism? (Freud ......................SchiZoAnAYsIs... Psychoanalysis) – 8-Bit Philosophy





Join Wisecrack! ►►'
We're Wisecrack, a media collective run by comedians, academics, filmmakers, 
and artists who are endlessly curious about the world around us. 
Our channel explores great topics in amazing and unexpected ways
 to make them fun and engaging. There's a lot of variety on our channel, 
 
but "trust us": if you SUBSCRIBE, you won't regret it!|||| Weird?

Press Start for "Do We Crave Fascism?" by 8-Bit Philosophy, where classic video games introduce famous thinkers, problems, and concepts with quotes, teachings, and more. 


-------------------------------------------------------------------- thank you GillesDeleuzeVK for------------ 

Difference engineer professor Keith Ansell Pearson - Self-Cultivation as an Ethics of Resistance


____________________________________________










1.18.2016

Gilles Deleuze, Co-author Co-Author Co-Author Co-Author of Anti-Oedipus, would have been 91 and

________________________________________________________________
 because a thinker's born many times/ he's born in the work of other people/ and sometimes centuries apart

 But philosophers are not born but reborn . See Plato: the philosopher's soul is reborn every ten thousand years. Which is why Plato could have read Deleuze reading Hegel .  Simultaneous Karmic incarnation?



Gilles Deleuze, CoCOCOCCOCOCCOCauthor of Anti-Oedipus, would have been 91. 

 

_________However it's a fun idea it does not add up as Philosophers can never 'could have .' 

 

  Philosophers are always 








  • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||\




     think of the platonic vaccum ___ versus the cave?



    |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


    _________________and you see Sartre talked about philsophical epochs and that one could not think outside of those epochs and that if you tried you'd only be going backwards or end up repeating what's been said/

    Interesting don't you think? so what Epoch's Deleuze ....hahhaha O yes hands fluttering in the air oh yeah there's that funny  it's  a reference ot that funny remark about our this century (which was t he 20) (now over) being a Deleuzian one

     that's  a referral to a kind of epoch or a proper name as guattari and deleuze like to call it
      but epoch says more and less
       and it hints at the word Epoke  which I believe is  term in Husserl but how it's used I am not familiar with but

     I betcha it has something to do with time       and the phenomena of time's multiple eclipse

       riff riff  but here the epoch is what then ? what episteme are we locking into or reckoned by?
      as it s   a kind of velocity machine a clock and some thing like a flow all at the same time

    A  geology machine you see and a liquid form of the full body of the earth? that ever creating self creating mass of rotund being and becoming?


      well thinking's always made at the time it's made and it's whereabouts in that sense are never known but always to

    found or explained and explained in the best sense as revealing or opening hidden edifices in our brain which 
      block us from seeing and thinking new ideas and perceptions and awarenesses and consciousnesses


    and then there's all these dictators of deleuze's ideas going around commanding attention hither and yon

                      and some are authentic and breaking new ground but others are just boring and at times perpertrared by paranoiacs who really know nothing about thought and have not disciplined themselves
    or studied in any way   but are carving niches?

    I'm not sure really but they're not throwing lassoes out to new ideas I mean new thought

     BUt back to this idea that Deleuze would have been 91 etcetera 

                    It's not true and it's not likely for one he was very sick and had to die when he did
     the person the body died   yes and is what it was at the time


                       But for thought Deleuze never died Nor did he He just Jumped on the boat
                                        getting to the other side continuing his ideas 
                                                  in what soever immanent fold of  things 
                                      that suited him

                                                    and there were others there to greet him 
                                                                                     probably Spinoza at the window

                                                                                 and Guattari at         the       Door


                               So Deleuze  never died        
                                                                                            .




    _____________________________