Radio DelEuZe: August 2006

8.30.2006

radio waves

waves of radio covet the ground covered or
listen for spinoza's ear
of compassion

or leather leaks the bike
or her eyes are hair

Professeur Deleuze holds forth on the geology of stars
et desastres

8.15.2006

you must heed

must heed his voice at this moment in history as it was & is

pierre-felix stone happiness of the guattari

his friend other selving of Gilles Radio Deleuze

music et

What is this outside link inside link: dubious terms at best, like hard ware software. ther e are linkse flat or forward on of plane of consistency, we trace them, track are they in or out?

call in them Indoor outdoor entrance exit tentacles:

at radio frequency ensemble in a little cafe a carafe
une agencement
___

Over here smithmurphy [ indoor link?] listeners once more we vist this essay.. of this music and EAR.

"Though they do not limit their conception of pop to the traditionally defined market sector of mass-produced pop music, Deleuze and Guattari do emphasize that their thought often passes or resonates by way of what any Anglophone reader would immediately recognize as pop music.7 From their work in the Seventies onward, Deleuze and Guattari demonstrate a familiarity with many of the most respected and influential pop/rock songwriters and performers of the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties that goes well beyond the superficial humor and "street credibility" that such allusions provide. Ultimately, their references to pop music provide them and their readers with stabilizing refrains, points of connection and passage for rhizomatic thought, that are often as ...."

The 'external' link,
,
to Agitprop and some the ABC film with Parnet online

audio only .
Radio deleuze is not deluded, but inluding.

Papa D speaks
desire is construct an ensemble
a road a landscape a colour to make a woman
and in english to make
its rich

desire is constructivism

Mona nods her head brilliantly
Claire:yes Clifford

this is it this between me and Felix and Gilles... the lines.. varying.. trip or Klossowski nw god is dead we 've no centre...
Sorry Monsuer Yeats...
gyre gear of radio

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a questin of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor DChallanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics. my book on Kant’s different; I like it, I did it as a book about an enemy, a book about an enemy tries to show how his system works, how its various cogs-the tribunal of reason… but I suppose the main way I coped with it at the time was to see the history of philosophy as a sort of buggery or it comes to the same thing, immaculate conception. I saw myself as taking an author from behind taking an author from behind and giving him a child that would be his own offsprings, yet monstrous. It was really important for it to be his own child, cuz the author had to actually say all I had him saying,

but the child was bound to be monstrous too, cuz it resulted from all sorts of shifting, slipping, dislocation and hidden emissions…

_____AnD