Radio DelEuZe: April 2007

4.26.2007

aBC

Semiotext(e) presents: GILLES DELEUZE “ FROM A TO Z ” _________________________________________ From A to Z is a series of 24 screenings based on a filmed interview between Gilles Deleuze and Claire Parnet. Each screening shows one letter from the 8 hour long interview and groups other films around each theme presented by Deleuze, from "A as in Animal" to "Z as in Zigzag." _________________________________________ Screening Number Six: "F as in Friendship" Sunday, April 29th, 2007, 8:30 p.m. at the Mandrake Bar 2692 S La Cienega Blvd Los Angeles _________________________________________ Pierre André Boutang: Gilles Deleuze / Claire Parnet: From A to Z: "F as in Frendship" (1988) 15 minutes (Translated by Charles J. Stivale) Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub: En rachâchant (1982) 7 minutes (Story by Marguerite Duras) Harun Farocki: Jean-Marie Straub and Daniele Huillet at Work on Franz Kafka's "Amerika" (1983) [Exerpt] 10 minutes Pedro Costa: Where Does Your Hidden Smile Lie? (2001) [ A portrait of Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub during the editing of Sicilia!] 65 minutes __________________________________________ Screening Number Seven: "G as in Gauche (Left)" with films by Chris Marker, Jean-Luc Godard...

4.09.2007

radio deleuze hosting _ however briefly the late jdeeReader

frequenCy radio Free EurOpe Verse: of passive sentences, of object subjective moving from objec tivity to objectivity what verve whatjoy!

affirming the being of all being

the BingComing of Bing and Bang and Boing and Bright Pang BirthBright.

---------------------------

Jacques Derrida talks on the notion of stupidity departing from a text of Gilles Deleuze but in relation to Lacan, Freud and also Avital Ronell who is present at this seminar held in Paris for the students of the European Graduate School....

And dig this funny series of del euZionary PhotoS

A man and his hat.EverYMan His OWn Hat. Hat. Fat.

A Man and his Hat. Magpie.

of which, wherefrom a take from a ligne des molecules

deleuzion

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a questin of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor DChallanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics. my book on Kant’s different; I like it, I did it as a book about an enemy, a book about an enemy tries to show how his system works, how its various cogs-the tribunal of reason… but I suppose the main way I coped with it at the time was to see the history of philosophy as a sort of buggery or it comes to the same thing, immaculate conception. I saw myself as taking an author from behind taking an author from behind and giving him a child that would be his own offsprings, yet monstrous. It was really important for it to be his own child, cuz the author had to actually say all I had him saying,

but the child was bound to be monstrous too, cuz it resulted from all sorts of shifting, slipping, dislocation and hidden emissions…

_____AnD