3.31.2010

Chez Deleuze


  Le halo de buzz électrique compose un mouvement brownien autour de phonèmes difficilement articulés. Gilles devient imperceptible : Challenger, c'est la fin du premier chapitre de IOOO plateaux.

Richard je dois raccrocher, encore une sévère crise d'asthme.

Je lui souris et il m'embrasse. 

A travers Paris je sens le fil d'Ariane qui le sépare maintenant, imperceptiblement, de la vie.


Nous nous retrouvons à St Leonard de Noblat où avancent d'un pas inégal les porteurs costumés du poids le plus lourd.

Une étrange et belle sérénité empli l'atmosphère tansdis qu'une buée immatérielle de larmes étranges peuplent mes yeux. Il pleut. Le train. Paris.  



Richard Pinhas
Ile de Ré
Avril 1997

Un grupo de niños pasa por la calle. Una luz entra y sale del tercer piso del edificio donde vivió el filósofo Gilles Deleuze. Y el comienzo de una pieza de piano para niños de Robert Schumann. Ejercicio de composición: Plano secuencia y célula musical. Realizado entre octubre y noviembre del 2009 para Spinoza producciones.  


Which being a delicate visit and tribute to the philosopher and some of the music he wrote about  ~ 









Found at http://www.youtube.com/user/gonzaloras

3.30.2010

GolD Finger





  1. ------------------------ And on a incompletely derelated  level this quoted patch 

  2. of interest and exctig  tendency

  3. ------------- Did you go Bowling CD?

  4. Yes he did.


  5. On exhibit in the British Museum since 1802 when the English appropriated the stone after Napoleon's defeat, The Rosetta has since embodied a primal scene in the archive of reading and compressed what Deleuze calls "a cloud of virtual images" or possible reading futures that surround "every actual." (Dialogues, Columbia University Press, 1987: 148) Virtuals and unencrypted images that have attached themselves to the stone and its origins coalesce around war and reading: as French excavation and decipherment (Derrida); as global conflict -- Syriana and the bombed out El-Rashid Hotel; as the British Museum, epicenter of vast cultural agencies and mnemonic objects amassed during the age of empire building; and as language learning software sold today at airport kiosks and over the Internet under the name Rosetta Stone.

--------------------------- The cloud is pervasive in the Bond series.A ll apears clear but it aint necessarily so.






  •   Asssssssssszzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz h for Mister HitchCoCk
  • We all know he read Volume 1 of Difference and Repetition and was ever After Inspired!


'These same kinds of transports, signature sign systems, mnemonic relays, and compressed virtualities at work on the Rosetta are at play in Tom Cohen's groundbreaking, densely elusive yet revelatory new study of Hitchcock's cinematic archive. 





Hitchcock's Cryptonymies, published simultaneously in two, 'hyperlinked' volumes, Secret Agents and War Machines, "takes 'Hitchcock' as a Rosetta Stone," for "cinema's advent, its accelerating role in a teletechnic revolution, and its presumed death, as if at the hands of new media" (Agents 2). In addition to incorporating this historio-graphic allegory, Cohen's 'Hitchcock' becomes both a planetary, futuristic reading room and a platform for invention, a medium to rehearse what I will call a Nanotechnology of Reading that has implications for critical readers beyond the Hitch canon.








This delicate patch work is From  Where? from Scope that 's where.

3.29.2010

movement time.... image....

 A reading and discussion of the concepts of movement-image and time-image as developed in the work of                                    --------------- of profesSor ChallengeR


  from mister mcdonald '928' indiced to the machinic pauses/cause  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______ CP  do you know anything about this video here?
CD No none at all but it looks good. and 
CP you're asleep
CD yes
however


_______________________


  1. -------------------------- there is always good work  at Corry Shores' Deleuze Cinema Project :  its well explained :  with a dozen or more   examples: of  clips and ventures into the  lines of inquiry and the passive active engagement of the movie goer| I call it goin to the movies
  2. with Shores of Deleuze! 

CP
thank goodness its well thought out .

because your 
own machines are a complexifctation of chaoids!

-------------------------------------CD>- Today Corry  has an
exciting entry
 named 

... Francis





...
Francis began to run, and in so doing, reconstituted a condition 
(between each line add a thought)
that was as pleasurable to his being as it was natural: the running for 


(an observation)


bases after the crack of the bat, the running from accusation, the 






(perception)
running from the calumny of men and women, the running from family, 




(comment or question)


from bondage, from destitution of spirit through ritualistic 


(mark a spot inside yourself)
straightenings, the running, finally, in quest for pure flight as a 




(              )


fulfilling mannerisms of the spirit.

(try )

From the novel Ironweed p 75
William Kennedy




3.28.2010

Rats are rhizomes

rats are rhizomes would not have become popular nor become the name
of magazines and such like
can you see people in departments and artschools

doing that? Sayin O yes I am doing ratrhizome studies!

Burrows
of

of creatures?

... fragmented total... live that cry and hue Burrows

the .. chaos... fragmented total... live that cry and hue Burrows

'The world has become chaos, but the book remains the image of the world: radicle-                                                    chaosmos rather than root-cosmos. A strange mystification: a book all the more total for                                                                                     being fragmented



          At any rate, what a vapid idea, the book as the image of the world. In truth, it is not enough to say, "Long live the multiple," difficult as it is to raise that cry


(Among the students were artists who were schizo on the hannging edge between philo
and literature and they were crucified by these ideas - as they always felt split between the two. As for myself I always knew you were not a philosopher.__ But you had the flow the rush of thinkers!  oui...... Clifford Duffy was never a philosopher nor was he. to be one that way..... he became the flood between barrels....  However, I was close to  the philosopher (welll close is putting it badly I said a ways back we were intercessors to him)  and he was a passionate student of love, literature and philosophy. That was good enough for me. And also one has to know in Paris at this time we didn't care much... for those categories ...and the dark years came slowly as Felix said the winter and slowly it was gone...  And so our great experimentations (really a delay )                        came to endings... and some died others left others went back to their old habits....)
                                                                                                                   No typographical, lexical, or even syntactical cleverness is enough to make it heard



The multiple must be made , not by always adding a higher dimension,

  1. but rather in the simplest of ways, by dint of sobriety, 



with the number of dimensions one already has available--always n -1 (the only                                      way the one belongs to the multiple: always subtracted).

Subtract the unique from the multiplicity to be constituted; write at n -1 dimensions. A system of this kind could be called a rhizome. '

A rhizome as subterranean stem is  _ Challenger looked at me. I looked back. He said you know that things under the ground smell, they rot, they decay and stink  that the the underground is not scenteless Monsieur Duffy. Bones rattling in the backdrop. He handed me back thirty pages, marked with notes on each excepting for the last. It was my master's thesis. I had developed the idea in in 1977 . I was nervous. He was not . He was the orgre of the Voice. Quel VOix Professeur! but so .                                                                                      He was decent. He was meeting his co-worker Felix Guattari at the 2pm to do an interview and he suggested I attend as  part of the 'supporting cast.' Not to speak of course! but to listen to them explaining more of the ideas of the subterranean undeground stem of the bodies without organs.




'absolutely different from roots and radicles. Bulbs and tubers are rhizomes. Plants with roots or 


radicles may be rhizomorphic in other respects altogether: the question is whether plant life in its specificity is not entirely rhizomatic. Even some animals are, in their pack form                                                                                                . Rats are rhizomes. 




Burrows are too, in all of their functions of shelter, supply, movement, 

____________CP: it's interesting isn't it CD how the rhizome became the popular image of Guattari's (and Deleuze's) notion of the multiple and Not the Burrow

CD:I think both of the ideas got caught in a misrepresentation: both burrows and rhizomes are earthy  things, they are sticky to the touch and very often a burrow smells! of its inhabitants and who wants to think of think of 
                                                                                                                               Little AnitiOedIpal  people running around their Minoritarian Burrow! people adapted these ideas to suit their recent experiences, which is inevitable but there is that interview where Professeur Deleuze speaks about co-opting ideas....


CP: and
CD: Another time.  He gets ready to leave. Laundry time in the space smooth burrow of his bedroom. His children are visiting from Dublin.


evasion, and breakout. The rhizome itself assumes very diverse forms, from ramified 

                                                     surface extension in all directions to concretion into bulbs and tubers. When rats swarm over each other. The rhizome includes the best and the worst: potato and crabgrass, or the 



( So his thesis was accepted by Professor Challenger the next year. At Vincennes lots of work was taken that would not have been accepted somewhere else.  It gave him the freedom to write as he became. He became what he was a line almost perfect in its purity and sobriety) 
























          weed. Animal and plant, couchgrass is crabgrass.


 _____________________________ Become  ______ what you are ......
Turn off the radio.


_________





3.25.2010

the grandeur of marx ~ prof deleuze's unwritten book ...




__________________Deleuze __zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Marx and Politics: 'the Grandeur of Marx'____Deleuze _____________________
written by
Nicholas Thoburn

For the race summoned forth by art or philosophy is not the one that claims to be pure but rather an oppressed, bastard, lower, anarchical, nomadic, and irremediably minor race. (Deleuze and Guattari 1994: 109)


One does not belong to communism, and communism does not let itself be designated by what it names. (Blanchot 1997: 295)


"Deleuze's (1995a: 51) comment that his last book, uncompleted before his death, was to be called The Grandeur of Marx leaves a fitting openness to his corpus and an intriguing question. How was this philosopher of difference and complexity — for whom resonance rather than explication was the basis of philosophical engagement — to compose the 'greatness' of Marx?(1)

What kind of relations would Deleuze construct between himself and Marx, and what new lines of force would emerge? Engaging with this question and showing its importance, Éric Alliez (1997: 81)

suggests that 'all of Deleuze's philosophy . . . comes under the heading "Capitalism and Schizophrenia'". Since the proper name of such a concern with the 'demented' configuration of capitalism2 is of course Marx, Alliez continues: 'It can be realized therefore just how regrettable it is that Deleuze was not able to write the work he planned as his last, which he wanted to entitle Grandeur de Marx.' But this is not an unproductive regret. For, as Alliez proposes, the missing book can mobilize new relations with Deleuze's work. Its very absence can induce an engagement with the 'virtual Marx' which traverses Deleuze's texts: we can take comfort from the possibility of thinking that this virtual Marx, this philosophically clean-shaven Marx that Deleuze alludes to in the opening pages of Difference and Repetition . . . can be mobilized in the form of an empty square(3) allowing us to move around the Deleuzian corpus on fresh legs."
(Alliez 1997: 81)

The
excerpts are taken
from
the
Scribd version of this book

books online here
pdf and/or text download available ~

Deleuze Marx & Politics

____________
and from Mute magazine online last year this seminar a little late to attend! but still it is interesting to see that people are interested
in these ideas and the virtual connect between them and Doc Del's last unwritten and 'virtual' book of Marxian Grandeur



Deleuze, Marx & Politics A seminar OpenPublishing | Calendar
Submitted by mute on Tuesday, 19 February, 2008 - 14:03
28/05/2008 - 1:00pm
28/05/2008 - 5:00pm
Etc/GMT
Deleuze, Marx & Politics
A seminar at the University of East London
Hosted by the School of Social Sciences, Media and Cultural Studies
May 28th 2008
1:00pm - 5:00pm
Keynote Speaker: Nicholas Thoburn author of 'Deleuze, Marx and Politics' (Routledge, 2003), co-editor of Deleuze & Politics (Edinburgh University Press, 2008).
Respondent: Jeremy Gilbert, author of Anticapitalism and Culture (Berg, 2008)
A discussion of Nicholas Thoburn's landmark work 'Deleuze, Marx and Politics' (Routledge, 2003), with the author. This book approaches Deleuze for the possibilities he offers for communist politics. Against those readings, from both right and left, which would situate Deleuze as a liberal - or banally libertarian -philosopher Thoburn bring out Deleuze's fundamental affinity with revolutionary politics. He will open this session by outlining some of the main points of the book, but all participants will be invited to contribute to discussion, which will focus on themes such as class, political expression, democracy, political affect, organisation and the party, markets and antimarkets.

Mona Ami Marx

_______________________________________________ Tuning into Radio rewinds ... last summer... echoe of ... nothing....

CD__________________________ Boys and girls the PhiLOSOphICal HOur:

CD adjusts headphone: What rumour crap did I hear recently a few months back 'deep' in my bunker? in me rhizomatic burrow....?
---------------------------------the usual blather ~ disused intelligence ~
DeLanda yacking about our fine friends Felix and Prof Challenger:: This to my astonishment and dropping jaw is what he said to an interlocutor:


"Well, frankly, I think Marxism is Deleuze and Guattari’s little Oedipus" Audience laughs. Cd points out there is nothing Frank or Candid about Delandi's comment. its a ruse of sadness. All students of Deleuze applaud/boo delanda's dumbass readings/ his paranoid interpretations.
Former student of Deleuze:((((((((((((((((((((((((((( if this was not so dumb!
it woulld be of interest)__ the problem is its dumb
___ because is not interesting. I mean, what on earth is rambling on this way for.. the man has _ Friend of Guattari and worker at Laborde: it doesnt go anywhere. its a parasitic thought that tries to set itself
as original in fact its a false pretender like much of mister delandi's ideation


_________________Deleuze and Guattari took their dog delandi for a walk on a leash and he bit and he pull AN finally one day he ran away to reaction oedipus dog thought. he say to Daddio Deleuze Mummy you got a porcupine quill Up Yer ass called marx!
Guattari laughed her head off. Delandi was a cutting edge be vel. He bore the monniker of marxiant trauma. he was t he woodpecker of truce and felt.
-_------------------------------------------- Read : the traverSal is the diagonAl




___________________________ CP comments on DelanDio __ "Well he fucks over
his own lines of to chart mark dance, require, wind and unwind. Wherefore this remark about d&g and their 'little oedipus'?? _ And what about his 'little oedipus' ? hahah
Delandi is not DelandAda. His the corpse of the paranoid period.

CD____________________
and his off the cuff remark /tries to be cunning/reminds me of that french student _ Michel Cressole who blasted Deleuze in a book_ yes, I've read chunks of it, and its cute, and wrong and mean, __- and Deleuze's subsequent Letter to a Harsh Critic.


A naked Woman with Guattari's book between her thighs along with the complete works of Marx. esp. the 1844 manuScript.
"Besides which there is Tons in Marx that is of Value and____> You dont need to be a professor holding a chair in some department of philosophy or literature to realize how wrong and off the mark Mister Delanda is. It's my impression he's just tryin to outdo them. Its sort of sick too because one imagines that Deland is smart. I have never read him for more than 20 minutes. his ideas are of no interest to me, they are too complicated and self serving. And now a few years later and he wants To KnOCk Guattari"
Deleuze____________ I loved Marx from the day I read him! he was my mother!


Naked student continues:
"for Loving the Marx they did. Throwing their ideas back at them as if they had not foreseen what he says."
""""the small piece of territory they must keep to come back at night after a wild day
of deterritorializing."""_____ What the ???
Wild day of rigorous work?
Guattari did not Live
with Prof. Challenger delandi

What is this "wild day of deterritorlazling? crap
What on earth is he speaking about

who needs to rest when yer busy? Rest what is this an old folks' home?
Who could blame them for needing a resting place,___ [Pure rhetoric who said they was tired? ](NOw he gets cute after a familiar
place with all the reassurances of the Marxist tradition (and its powerful

________philosophy and martyrs?
iconography of martyrs and revolutionaries)? The question is whether we need__ We're tired of your blather Delandi
that same resting place (clearly we need one, but should it be the same?
Shouldn’t each of us have a different one so that collectively we can eliminate
them?)." ______Eliminate what? our illusions? Come off the band wagon. YOu really think Guattari had time to be tired misreading marx as some mama figurine?

People can make their own r
resting pods
Some of us like
to Sleep
with
A piLLoW
called
Marx's complete works
under our heads



Welll Maybe Delandi needs a place to rest and hes welcome
to find
one but what is fiddle faddle
about all of us resting
You think
Chomsky rests?
or the ones in the jungle
mister Delandi
Go rest
an arrest yourself
each does
what each thinks she must



I dont understand this and see no use for it.
The pragmatics of AntiOedipusee
are clear
as a bell
Use what you Want and Need
and Leave the rest Behind

its all About How
an d Not why
and martyrs and traditions
and the rest of that shit

Its the Opposite
they go the other Way

They say Like the Dadas before them
and Alfred Jarrry

Make your Genealogy
Make your AnCestors
and Poetic/philosophical
Lines of Inquiry


I believe
Deland wants to be

De Landa wants to try
to be dele
uze and guattari.
(but he aint got a guttari! Poor man without
his left
what can his right paranoid arm do?
what becomes of these nonbecomers?
)
But he cannot . So accusing them of Being in need of oedipal
resting spot he hangs his own
projections onto them

So he like Zizek and other minor
thinkers
tries
to erase
the
double lines
of thought

set off by these
BinOCular
Great
Thinkers


he knows nothing of the french left. he did not live.it he is the actual example of ImiTation & Not BecomIng in this remark. As for th e
rest he delivers a terrible lecture,

and is not at all hip to poetry.


___________
I saw Delanda speaking once a few years back I was not impressed
with the anguish his point of

view appeared to conceal.



___________________

some of the interview
with Mister Delanda

(Non-Da)

is found

at this horribly named
'text'

"Deleuzian Interrogations'
What a terribly inquisitorial named

'piece'

here
in pdf



___________________


Anyhow, one cannot pursue this for too

long
we
're too busy
living

and
deterritorializing


____________


Love

__________________




3.23.2010

Alain Badiou : "Oui, le temps réel de la vraie politique est le présent"


"La temporalité de l'action inventive, de l'action qui vise non à gérer le monde tel qu'il est mais à y faire surgir des possibilités inconnues, est toujours, non pas du tout sous l'empire d'une représentation de l'avenir, mais sous celui de l'urgence du présent. Qu'on pense seulement à ce que signifie l'incertitude d'une insurrection, l'attente anxieuse du succès ou de l'échec d'une manifestation, voire le simple contentement de mener à la porte d'une usine une discussion significative avec un groupe d'ouvriers, ou la tension d'une veille nocturne pour empêcher si possible, au petit matin, une rafle de la police dans un foyer d'ouvriers de provenance africaine. Oui, le temps réel de la vraie politique est le présent, l'intensité exceptionnelle que confère au présent de n'être plus dans le sillon des habitudes, des petites jouissances et des rivalités secondaires où s'enlise la vie telle que l'Etat la considère. La passion de la politique n'a pas pour affect la représentation dite "utopique" d'un avenir glorieux. Son affect se rapporte au contraire à ce qui advient d'imprévisible, à l'étonnement magique de ce que telle ou telle rencontre improbable a eu lieu, que tel ou tel mot d'ordre a été trouvé, dans une langue à la fois dure et claire, à l'issue d'une réunion improvisée. Kant l'a bien vu : cet affect révolutionnaire, c'est l'enthousiasme pour l'événement, et non la délectation abstraite du futur."

"Ce sont les politiciens parlementaires qui, dans leurs "programmes", auxquels eux-mêmes ne croient guère, promettent de satisfaire dans l'avenir les intérêts de leurs diverses clientèles.

Le "bonheur", pour eux, n'est jamais que la satisfaction, demain, des intérêts particuliers, la sécurité des routines et la perpétuation des fortunes. Mais le bonheur, dont j'espère qu'on pourra à nouveau le dire "communiste", n'est pas de cet ordre. Il est la découverte de ce que chacun est capable de bien plus de choses nouvelles que ce qu'il imaginait. L'opposition véritable, quant au bonheur, n'est pas entre le futur et le passé. Elle scinde le présent en une représentation conservatrice et sécuritaire et une urgence enthousiaste pour se nouer à ce qui n'avait jamais eu lieu et cependant advient. Le bonheur communiste se dira : "Aimez ce que jamais vous ne verrez deux fois.""

Alain Badiou, "L'affect révolutionnaire, c'est l'enthousiasme pour l'événement", "Libération", mercredi 17 mars 2010.

3.19.2010

: Le cinéma de poésie ...

Pier Paolo Pasolini, Empirisme hérétique : Le cinéma de poésie et autres essais
présenté par Hervé Joubert-Laurencin

Professeur d’études cinématographiques à l’université d’Amiens, Hervé Joubert-Laurencin est spécialiste de Bazin, de Pasolini et du cinéma d’animation. Ses recherches actuelles portent sur la théorie et l’histoire de la critique de cinéma.
Ni sémiologique, ni linguistique, ni néo-bazinienne, ni néoréaliste, la théorie du cinéma de Pasolini, singulière et novatrice, réactive au cinéma la distinction prose-poésie et le style indirect libre, dont seul Gilles Deleuze a su faire un usage sérieux. Le concept inédit “d’intégration figurale”, d’inspiration auerbachienne, celui “d’inexprimé existant”, et le motif de la mort violente la parcourt. Straub, Chaplin et Kennedy assassiné la traversent.



Date d'envoi : 11/03/10



Cours de cinéma : Gilles Deleuze, "crise de l’image-action"

The crisis of the action image?

To the movies with Deleuze and Thoret ______________________ Move that image that movie SineMA. the crise? What crisis ? Movies never end their molecular twist and learn.
_____________From a recent lecture about Deleuze and Cinema.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
présenté par Jean-Baptiste Thoret. Spécialiste du Nouvel Hollywood et du cinéma de genre, Jean-Baptiste Thoret est critique à Charlie Hebdo et chroniqueur à France Culture. À paraître : “Michael Mann, un Saturne américain” (Éd. Cahiers du cinéma, 2010).
Gilles Deleuze clôt “L’Image-Mouvement” par un chapitre, “La crise de l’image-action”, dans lequel, à partir des films d’Hitchcock (Fenêtre sur cour), il identifie la fi n de cette grande forme propre au cinéma hollywoodien, qui se manifeste d’abord par la perte du “lien sensorimoteur”. Quelles furent les conséquences esthétiques et formelles de cette crise ? Aujourd’hui, après la redécouverte du cinéma américain des années 70, ce concept est-il toujours valide
?


Cours de cinéma : Gilles Deleuze, "crise de l’image-action"

3.14.2010

and and a nd





Can't hear with the waters of. The chittering waters of. Flitter-
ing bats, fieldmice bawk talk. Ho! Are you not gone ahome?
What Thom Malone? Can't hear with bawk of bats, all thim liffey-
ing waters of. Ho, talk save us! My foos won't moos. I feel as old
as yonder elm. A tale told of Shaun or Shem? All Livia's daughter-
sons. Dark hawks hear us. Night! Night! My ho head halls. I feel
as heavy as yonder stone. Tell me of John or Shaun? Who were
Shem and Shaun the living sons or daughters of? Night now!
Tell me, tell me, tell me, elm! Night night! Telmetale of stem or
stone. Beside the rivering waters of, hitherandthithering waters
of. Night!

Finnegans Wake
J.Joyce



Oh, to be in England

Now that April's there,
And whoever wakes in England
Sees, some morning, unaware,
That the lowest boughs and the brushwood sheaf
Round the elm-tree bole are in tiny leaf
Round the chaffinch sings on the orchard bough
In England - now


__________________
IT's Not April Cd
its midMarch
and the marsh of rains!

______________
Ballad of Reading Gaol

For oak and elm have pleasant leaves
That in the springtime shoot:
But grim to see is the gallows-tree,
With its adder-bitten root,
And, green or dry, a man must die
Before it bears its fruit!

Oscar Wilde

------------------




Trees to human voices








Mrs Dalloway

Virginia Woolf

A marvellous discovery indeed - that the human voice in certain atmospheric conditions (for one must be scientific, above all scientific) can quicken trees into life! Happily Rezia put her hand with a tremendous weight on his knee so that he was weighted down, transfixed, or the excitement of the elm trees rising and falling, rising and falling with all their leaves alight and the colour thinning and thickening from blue to the green of a hollow wave, like plumes on horses' heads, feathers on ladies', so proudly they rose and fell, so superbly, would have sent him mad.


Woolf seems to suggest that Septimus
has the power that the old god did!
to touch trees with his voice
conjuring intensity and life itself __
and thus
her tree is the elm tree of immanence





3.12.2010

Rhythms of a Slaughter




For now, in lieu of writing something more complete, about:



Corry Shores '__________recent ________ series Deleuze__ Bacon

go to_____________



Rhythms of a Slaughter [29] Triptych, Three Studies for a Crucifixion, 1962. Deleuze

on Bacon, Painting Series




And just today

cP to CD







CP___ Are you suggesting then that all of the blogs constitute cogs and elements in the machine you've constructed?

CD               Exactly is what I'd say to that and to say also that the recall                   the patrol ofthe various things is the machines and their words harried none.           Make the verb known word.


Cp Are you paid to do this?
CD _Paid! I pay to do it! that's why I am not a neurotic paying some nutcase analyst! I I pay for free art! _ Viva la dollars avida dollars as Breton said of Salvador.___ O yes the economy of artist         an infinite thing and shamed by the capitalist hose: pissing it down. Think of that recent Giacometti or was it                        a Rembrandt.... that kind of money                   one can                      feed a village.. .. shame shame... shame...


Cp So you're against this inflation of art by capital?

Cd _   Well, yes, CP that seems pretty obvious that anyone... well, you know it's sort of obvious... right... being against it... its a  strong thing to say..., I mean..  both of those artists are dead.. right,,, what did they make in their lives???I say take the loot. Or as my father Jean Genet said my earnings or royalties make no difference   to the big machine... but these paintings well, that-the sale of those things... they've become 'defacto' things... that does  make s a difference. its a terrible cruel market... of capitalist trading back and forth....





its the same thing with these fascist critics
who want to determine how an artist 
should blog,, there s been one recent small critic who wants to force writers to blog according to his/her own ideas... of
things...


she/he even tried to use Challenger's ideas to
prove themselves right!


As if CHallenger could give a shite
dead or alive!

------------------------------

Let the poem do the rocking ...
when two vowels go walking
the first one does the talking...
----------------
CP many people think you're crazy that's what they say... 

CD Well good! all the better! ... and besides.. you know resentment  men of resentiment as Nietzsche put it...
women of resentiment....