radio deleuze: Well aware that .. .. MIchel Foucault fiction and

9.26.2011

Well aware that .. .. MIchel Foucault fiction and

____________Did you hear these words before? was there a knight holding a fiction fort against his plating rest his arrest and her breast whitedoved as the somber sign of the sun?

she heard this quiet lecture:
'I am well aware that I have never written anything but fictions.

I do not mean to say, however, that truth is therefore absent.

It seems to me that the possibility exists for fictions to function in truth,

for a fictional discourse to induce effects of truth,

and for bringing it about that a true discourse engenders or “manufactures” something that does not as yet exist,'

-------------------------------------------------------

that is, “fictions” it.

One “fictions” history on the basis of a political reality that makes it true,

one “fictions” a politics not yet in existence on the basis of a historical truth.

________________________________________________________________

Mister

Michel Foucault said that and its been translated into English inn this book: by the name of:

Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977.

According to repute there are other transfers and translations of these secret books of Mister Foucault whose name contains the word Fou `.
_________________

___________

Le but, ce n’est pas de répondre à des questions, c’est de sortir, c’est d’en sortir.

G. VELTSOS: En ce sens-là vous êtes ami avec Deleuze parce que vous créez ensemble un monde ?

F. G. : C’est ça. Mais comme je le disais dans une interview, je suis ami avec Deleuze mais je ne suis pas copain. Je ne sais pas comment l’on pourrait traduire ça. Parce que, par exemple, avec Deleuze on s’est toujours vouvoyé, on a toujours gardé une grande proximité et une grande distance amicale. Comme si l’on en avait besoin, précisément, pour maintenir la consistance de notre tapisserie commune. (...)

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a questin of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor DChallanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which seperates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threantening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License.