Radio DelEuZe: the usual insanity

9.11.09

the usual insanity

dont wear a poppy______
______________________________________________________________
its the usual inSanity with Clifford duffy Big ego no brains no substance, a pure schizoid one, InsanIty nuts, a trial by error, deductive logic at its level worst, a farce in the making a repetitious sorehead, a weak link in the chain of deterritorialization

_________________________yesterday he complaind of hunger all day.
tonight hes crazy as a lapdog. a Lap top! a lap dancer, hes a lamb dancer. a machine.
On statge last night he said, and here are his very words:

Ladies and Gentlemen Let me Introduce

___________________In the other room hidden from the alcove, an idiot barked on. A security walked in and out of the room taking off her clothes wishing him a goodnight. They did I repeat make love,not once. H e was shitting bricks. the guy in the other room.

Mister Duffy meantime stands on stage with nothing on the new

~~Eva Partun~~ Ewa Partun

Come see Mister Duffy with No clothes and you too can find your stage hand a dog for delight. a ruin for fright

___________________holdingthisweightweheftourbodyOur

_____________________________________________the insecurity guardian said
have a goodnight

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.