9.26.2017

'Deleuze et la littérature (1/4) : Sous les signes de Proust ... Lelelivre dedeDeleuze....

_________________________________________

 Il  y  a  un e  Jubilation ...   a la creation des Concepts....






Published on 20 May 2017





s







NOUVEAUX CHEMINS DE LA CONNA




ISSANCE ÉMISSION DIFFUSÉE SUR FRANCE CULTURE LE 05.12.2016. PAR ADÈLE VAN REETH. AUJOURD'HUI, NOUS ÉVOQUONS EN COMP

AGNIE DU PHILOSOPHE ET PROUSTIEN JACQUES DARRIULAT




CETTE LECTURE PHILOSOPHIQUE DU CHEF-D'ŒUVRE DE PROUST À LA RECHERCHE DU TEMPS PERDU. "CE QUI FORCE À PENSER, C'EST














LE SIGNE", ÉCRI














T DELEUZE DANS SON ESSAI DE 1964 "PROUST ET LES SIGNES". LA RECHERCHE DU TEMPS PERDU SERAIT ALORS NON PAS LE LIVRE DE LA MÉMOIRE, MAIS UN ROMAN D'APPRENTISSAGE - APPRENTISSAGE DU DÉCHIFFREMENT DES SIGNES QUI Y PROLIFÈRENT, DES SIGNES VIDES DE LA MONDANITÉ AUX SIGNES DE L'ART QUI NOUS METTENT FACE AUX ESSENCES. LE TEXTE DU JOUR : « CE QUI FORCE À PENSER, C’EST LE SIGNE. LE igne est l’objet d’une rencontre ; mais c’est précisément la contingence de la










rencontre qui garantit la nécessité de ce qu’elle donne à penser. L’acte de penser ne découle pas d’une simple possibilité naturelle. Il est, au contraire, la seule création véritable.
La création, c’est la genèse de l’acte de penser dans la pensée elle-même. Or cette genèse implique quelque chose qui fait violence à la pensée, qui l’arrache à sa stupeur naturelle, à ses possibilités seulement abstraites. Pens


er, c’est toujours interpréter, c’est-à-dire expliquer, développer, traduire un signe. Traduire,


déchiffrer, développer sont la forme de la création pure. Il n’y a pas plus de significations explicites que d’idées claires. Il n’y a que des sens impliqués dans des signes ; et si la pensée a le pouvoir d’expliquer le signe, de le développer dans une Idée, c’est parce que l’Idée est déjà là dans le signe, à l’état enveloppé et enroulé, dans l’état obscur de ce qui force à penser. Nous ne cherchons la vérité que dans le temps, contraints et forcés. Le chercheur de vérité, c’est le jaloux qui surprend un signe mensonger sur le visage de l’aimé. C’est l’homme sensible, en tant qu’il rencontre la violence d’une impression. C’est le lecteur, c’est l’auditeur, en tant que l’œuvre d’art émet des signes qui le forcera peut-être à créer, comme l’appel du génie à d’autres génies. Les communications de l’amitié bavarde ne sont rien, face aux interprétations silencieuses d’un amant. La philosophie, avec toute sa méthode et sa bonne volonté, n’est rien face aux pressions secrètes de l’œuvre d’art. Toujours la création, comme la genèse de l’acte de penser, part des signes. L’œuvre d’art naît des signes autant qu’elle les fait naître ; le créateur est comme le jaloux, divin interprète qui surveille les signes auxquels la vérité se trahit. » Gilles Deleuze, Proust et les signes, PUF/Quadrige, 1964 (1988 2e édition), pp.118-119 Extraits : - Archive Deleuze : Abécédaire / Signes - Archive Deleuze sur







Proust Lectures : - Marcel Proust, A la recherche du temps perdu, Gallimard, coll. La Pléiade, (ed. de Jean-Yves Tadié, 1988), tome 1, Du côté de chez Swann, pp. 138-140. Lu par André Dussolier, ed. Thélème - Marcel Proust, A la recherche du temps perdu, Gallimard, coll. La Pléiade, (ed. de Jean-Yves Tadié, 1988), tome 1, Du côté de chez Swann, pp.177-180. Lu par André Dussolier, ed. Thélème - Marcel Proust, A la recherche du temps perdu, Gallimard, coll. La Pléiade, (ed. de Jean-Yves Tadié, 1988), tome 3, La Prisonnière, pp.692-693. Lu par André Dussolier, ed. Thélème Références musicales : - César Franck, Sonate en La maj - Guillaume Lekeu, Sonate en Sol maj - Anton Dvorak, Sextuor à cordes - Régine, Rattrapons le temps perdu Intervenant : - Jacques Darriulat : a enseigné la philosophie de l’art à l’université Paris-Sorbonne, il est l’auteur d’un site consacré à la philosophie : www.jdarriulat.net

9.14.2017

ask yourself twice

_________________


    Now ask yourself twice did I really think what I thought I did, did I really pursue a new thought bending around some corner where the twice felled gods a(rose) and clambered past the mighty sheets of time and

self conceit not deceiving yourself into a generational arrogance what believes believing its own shit? its own wit,

its own bellicose drama


not an idea, at all in that instance,

but a namby pamby crybaby repetition of the same and copying someone else's ideas.

Not idears, or ideas, but Id eas what's that Id eas?


 Plato stared at the cave long, and enough was past time it's reckoned second soup. Like Christ dying on the cross

right to the teeth his bones dying and crying out,

Lama Lama

 and was Christ jesus the gesso goat? the pain of 5000 years of civilization dormant forgiving and reconciling itself,


Christ first messiah of the sun and the resurrection of all matter across the universe

                 not Jesus the certain identity of a person


but Christ, the Christ the Sign of a new Burst burned in the sun of Future Matter

                                                           and Metaphysical


across                          over the radiant hours of               life of   death          of birth,



                                              and forever going on

                                                  Incomprehensible future


forged in the anthropology of human life and destiny, as it was,  this man of the future  .


                                              Eternal ripped in the becomings of forever



~


       






9.02.2017

Ask yourself__



___________________________________________



As k   your self in the morning if you are an inventor or just another interpreter and imperator of boring 

 pedantic pedagogy or if your ideas awaken the senses and brains bring new ideas

to birth




Ask your_selves how do I become many things in one and a lover to many handy concepts, notions and rich

 lanky thoughts 


                                         and always recognising ideas are not taken over or cop opted

                                 it's people what that happens

                                                                                                 with



                                          You on t he other hand must see to you your ideas shiver!


,




8.27.2017

All the names

________________________________



 Was I were you? all the names of history?  Was it you Kierkegaard?

   it's where Badiou misses t he mark because precisely cause perhaps he's classical as he says

  not seeing Nietzsche's move outside of the body

                     and into the body without organs



______________________ that's where you gotta Open the doors and Pages

                                                      of Antioedipus to get some explanations


_____________


Nobody

_________________________________________



   whatever happened to Kierkegaard? no  one ever seems to talk about him

                               whatever became of the infinite knight of faith?

                         leaping in the same place

                              the invisible being

                        other marvels and amazes of pseudonyms


___________________________________________

on the other hand, there's Alain Badiou ('s) lectures on Nietzsche and his take is not what I expected but now that I think o f it, at least what he says about himself, whats interesting is not everyone seeing N the identical manner

__________________________________




Big Bad Alain Badiou's take on Nietsche








_____________________whatever happened to the eternal return?_____________________________________________

Nietzsche - Deleuze .. as always or often



 while looking for something along these lines I came over this video which turns out to be a part of a series of lectures and talks

_____________________________







In Barbara Stiegler's talk she brings up (i've only seen it once but will listening an watching again)
 interesting connections about Apollo and Dionysus which made me think oh

yes  there's that Molar God of  the Sun

Apollo the paranoid

and Dionysus the revolutionary schizo ofthe night and the moon and the mad rays

 of desire__________________and its crazy unpredictable lines

                                                   of escape

                             -------------------------------------


Her understanding of Deleuze's take on Apollo the cop is just wrong headed and needlessly critical and academic __ notwithstanding  her nice ish french accent,

 she's just off the beam, __she never connects the Deleuze of Difference and Repetition to the one of A Thousand Plateaus and A/O where it's stated    and polemcially mocked

  about believing in these gods and taking them seriously as if mattered at all!

For Christ's Sake give it a break


No one needs or even wants to hear about the cop (ie the Signifier Apollo or any of that ilk) need ing  their place in the sun,

it's a given




 Molarity does exist already and so does the boring apollo and other cop dead gods.


Her reading on the b.w.o is just too easy, all these late academics are really getting boring, and not atll exciting,

 it's a pity!


I could not listen to the whole talk , it was silly I mean really who gives a rats ass.

Sometimes these people just go round and round in circles they are akin to liteary critics who similar things and endless talk about the meaning of someone's work,




_________________

More another time,


                we're sailing

                                            folds,




________________
__________________________________

3.10.2017

essence -existence

__________________


essence __ existence

         ___________________difference and repetition __not drawing a false parallel here but noting


the remarkable similarities,  and the schizo signifiers (which break the analogies 'the likes')

                            the split existence of god's existence,

 (and)  the name of the body,

   suggestion   like petals falling from eternity,




------------------

3.09.2017

Contre courant - 23 Janvier 17












________________________

To our Enemies _Eric Alliez & Maurizio Lazzarato_ link to the work    discussed in the above video 


1. We are living in the time of the subjectivation of civil wars. We did not leave the period of triumph of the market, automation of governmentality, and depoliticization of the economy of debt to go back to the era of “world views” and the conflicts between them. We have entered a time of building new war machines.


_________________

2.07.2017

John Sellars - Six Theses on Deleuze's Stoicism





------------------------------


Published on 10 Nov 2014
A/V#4.01 2006 Autumn
http://www.actualvirtualjournal.com/2...

This paper argues that Deleuze’s relationship with Stoicism goes far beyond his explicit comments on the Stoics in The Logic of Sense and that his philosophy as a whole is marked by a deeper Stoicism. It outlines six points of contact between Deleuze and Stoicism, locating the Stoics within Deleuze’s philosophical genealogy, and noting affinities in the areas of what might be labelled ontology, meta-philosophy, psychology, politics, and ethics.

2.06.2017

le concept du désir

______________________________________________


Deleuze sur le concept du désir : il conclut sur une approche constructiviste : “je désire dans un ensemble”, “il n'y a pas de désir qui ne coule dans un agencement”, “désirer c'est construire un agencement, c'est construire un ensemble”, quelque chose comme un réseau…


______________________________

5.06.2016

b'end academy dele

________________

end academy  File deleuze which doesnt need to bed one for Fel ix as his work never got recognized anyhow!||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


bake yr own feleuze cookies marketing yr own fomputer fomapany of besaire gasket idears as agencements



=====================

5.03.2016

between

-------------------------

______________  Gome up with zomething fetter if yr going to greate


 between each becoming a like

   a  dog
  
                  a desire


______________________D  SOund like a lame cow for gods sake out to the bog it goesChrist!

____________ 


___

you're foldin'

`


you're folding
yr books an blogs
mister deleuze


as the bilge
pores
forth
not
its






 
___________

jesus and pyschoanalysis

_______________




  Before the end of the world Jesus knew it was time but not psycho anal ysis but schizo
    the same
as  the



---

More acome again


__ cause how do you know what is really real  my green eyed Url



  it's the hence of the world as it's flat as a  laid out train? no something like that epic  train and book  .




lover to bloc and wood     .




____