Radio DelEuZe: re: 'concept'

28.2.10

re: 'concept'

their last book then is not their last book. but merely one at the end of the final series._________________I m not sure I understand you. _ Guess what? I am not sure either. but I m sure of this. that last book is just one at the end of the series. that death put a stop to. you cld say. On et Vous

We and You

Nous et Vous and like that song said: Voulez vous coucher avec moi, ce soir.
Voulez vous coucher avec moiVoulez Vous couchez avec moi ce soir? (imagine how awful that would have sounded if it said Tu vue couchez avec moi ce soir? hahahah it wld. have sounded idiotic! cldnt work! ____The vous vous thing is very precious important, creates the necessary distance.

------------------------------------------- Cp you re tired. Cd yes. and it looks like i am moving again. Cp _ Moving.

-----------------------------------------------------( Its sexy because its Vous and the unspoken inbetween play of the intimate tu that's unspoken)

______________Go to the next page. soon. Okay.
re 'concept' -----------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.