Radio DelEuZe: but there is no Z in Sartre you say

15.11.09

but there is no Z in Sartre you say

but

there

You

have to

Say

Zartre

Jean-Paul Zaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtree

nothingness

lakes

vacuoles

totalities

inertia

ossification

searching for a method

Saint Flaubert

No exit

Nausea melting being

Wall eyed

the anguish of a stone

Castor

Critique of Dial

ectial

reason

Baudelaire

The Idiot and his family

one chooses to be a writer

One chooses

out of impossible destinies

borne by necessity

scarcity

is no more

the critique of Stalinist materialist dialectics

Hegel in a spoon

serving the proletariat

Digging jazz

playing piano

this cafe goer

philosopher speaking to Castro

Philosopher travelling to UsSR

travelling to Africa

he was way ahead

of the last pope guy

and his mobile

supposed mobile

conquest

Sartre

and Giacometti

The waiter playing at being a waiter

Appearance and Reality are the same

page

Being and Nothingness

I been the nothingness

I hope the freight of flight

the train agains the dialectic

the intellectual

and the masses

we' come back

for sure

Nâzım Hikmet

the communist party

fellow traveller

__________

we'll come back

_____________________

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.