Radio DelEuZe: the articulate cage

15.11.09

the articulate cage

To express is always to sing the

glory of GodTo express is always to sing the glory of GodTo expresis always to sing the glory of God

Felix is a articndowulate animal there is a wolf in the wi Two believers cannot observe one another without laughing.” - e dismantled one's self in order

finally to be alone and meet the true double at the other end of the line. A

clandestine passenger on a motionless voyage. To become like everybody

else; but this, precisely, is a becoming only for one who knows how to be

nobody, to no longer be anybody.Gilles Two believers cannot observe one another without laughing.” - Gilles Deleuzebwhat darling daring atheismelievers cannot observe To express is always to sing the glory of God.

one another without laughing.” - Gilles Two believers cannot observe one another without laughing.” - Gilles Two believers cannot observe one another attained a kind of absolute deterritorialization.

She ended up knowing so much that she could no longer interpret anything.

There were no longer shadows to help her see more clearly, only

glare."6without

reconstituted chain itself becomes a content in relation to the "messenger."

here are double pincers everywhere

on a stratum; everywhere and in all

directions there are double binds

There is no question that the two lines are constantly interfering,

and lobsters, a multiplicity of double

articulations affecting both expression and content.

lau one another without laughing.” - iles Two believers cannot obse one anoghing.” - Jilles er without laughing.” - Gilreaches a sort of maximum quantum in her supple

segmentarity or lineleDeleuzebelievers cannot oeleuze

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.