Radio DelEuZe: plateau 16

5.12.09

plateau 16

'ut hat 'f the characters in it? they are in the
other ones, the blogs of-fiction some other
place I could put 'myself' 'my self-rempli'is it the plague
sniffing over there? the hurricane,a bastinado for your death.
basta-basta sirrah there's hurriancoes'

(U cee the mental police of blogz wanz two control spaces. that am alreadee r. what they cannt be. if you drop vowel. then itz movd ovr.)

'snow blowing wind whistle siren masts crackling

in the city walls the whoring lanes are plenty'

Cw___at adage of 22 you said you was in Paris? Over there right, I need to be certain of this snippet.

CD____ I never said I was anyone.

Fluctional beeiographematic.

Cw________Did you write these or did him?

CD_ Eyedid .

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.