Radio DelEuZe: in the radio

15.1.06

in the radio

in the radio there is no one home
no one home home no one doctor deleuze
in yer crystal set of package wings
when the microphone's slow
and the clutter snows across airs of
areial antennas ||is that how its said
and spelled as the spell grooms down
its mist talking the apocalyptic blues?

some voice that nights in the wind
winding back its voices tracks
in the somber night of ritual
the staggering hope of sensate senses
on this trip to India, Tibet.

and like Rimbaud I don a burnous
hugging the sirocco to my breast
nagged by night and event .

you weren't there then
when sufffering in my room
alone writing them first books
and the knock of night at my knees

Ill finish there now
a short broadcast this time
ce soir

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.