Deleuze and Literature Conference Schedule

Excitement , intensity, of affect Lawrence among Machines... But Miller Henry pas ici, it's the absence of the nodal...this to be its over the air-wave heard fire to speak its terrible silence. but why event? how does it happen _plane of consistency..... walks talk, Outside in , the air ,, Rain as was metaphor. but not so, knot metaphor....

we also hear a voice of one speaking pondering pounding into the skull skill of sky ...
direct and indirecting discourse... these epistemes left to run ....
blog are recording surface ...

Department of Philosophy

[n]

Not signed in
Sign in

Powered by Sitebuilder
© MMVII | Privacy
Accessibility

Deleuze and Literature Conference Schedule

[c]

Day 1: March 20^th 2006

Registration: 09.00 - 10.00 (Maths Building)

Plenary 1 - 10.00 - 12.00

Mary Bryden (Cardiff) – Deleuze and T. E. Lawrence: The Productivity of Shame

Antony Uhlmann (Sydney) – Deleuze's 'Image of Thought' and Literature

Chair: Darren Ambrose

Lunch - 12.00 - 13.30

Parallel Sessions - 13.30 - 15.30

Garin Dowd (Thames Valley) – Percept and Affect in Melville’s ‘Pierre, or The Ambiguities’

Leyla Ercan (Nuremberg) – Mattermorphoses: Gilles Deleuze and the Microphysics of PostHuman Agency in Herman Melville’s Works

Irving Goh (Singapore) – From Chuang Tzu to Deleuze: Writing, Becoming-Animal, and Disappearing

Chair: Eileen John

Anna Hickey-Moody (Monash) - Creative Pedagogy and its Media: Literature, Sound & Movement

Matthew Hammond (Exeter) – Expecting the Event: Dickens and Deleuze

Michael Goddard (Lodz) – The Series, Chaosmosis and Virtual Resonance: Deleuze’s Encounter with Gombrowicz

Chair: Scott Revers

Coffee Break - 15.30 - 16.00

Plenary 2 - 16.00 - 18.00

Dan Smith (Purdue) – Deleuze and the Philosophical Uses of Literature

Miguel de Bestegui (Warwick) – Madness and Jouissance in ‘À la recherche du temps perdu'

Chair: Siobhan McKeown

Day 2: March 21^st 2005

Plenary 3 - 10.00 - 12.00

David Musselwhite (Essex) - Deleuze and Guattari go to Wessex

Jeff Wallace (Glamorgan) – D.H. Lawrence among the Machines

Chair: Darren Ambrose

Lunch 12.00 - 13.30

Parallel Sessions - 1330 - 1530

Darren Ambrose (Warwick) - Deleuze, Murakami and the Literary Affect

Patricia MacCormack (Anglia Ruskin) – Deleuze and the Daemonic Fold: Lovecraft’s Baroque Becomings

Aislinn O’Donnell (UCD) – Compassion, Love and Democracy: Deleuze, Whitman and Arendt

Chair: Siobhan McKeown

Anneleen Masschelein (Leuven) – Deleuze & Guattari and D.H. Lawrence’s Epistemology of Affect and Percept

Eleanor Kaufman (California) – Bataille, Klossowski and Analogy

Jon Roffe (Tasmania) – The Secret Law of Literature: The Literary Idea in Maurice Blanchot’s ‘L’arret de mort'

Chair: Tom Greaves

Simon O’Sullivan (Goldsmiths) – Traitor Prophets: Mythopoesis and the Programmatic Character of Literature vs ‘Stuttering and Stammering’ and the ‘Affective-Event’

Ohad Zehavi – What is a Logical Novel? The Import of Literature to Deleuze’s Philosophy

Bruce Baugh (Thompson Rivers) – Let’s Get Lost – From the Death of the Author to the Disappearance of the Reader: A Deleuzian Analysis

Chair: Henry Somers-Hall

Coffee Break - 15.30 - 16.00

Plenary 4 - 16.00 - 17.00

James Williams (Dundee) – Deleuze, Péguy and the Event in Literature

Chair: John Protevi

Information

Registration

Getting here

email: D.Ambrose@warwick.ac.uk

Activities, Initiatives, Contacts:

Pli Deleuze

Page contact: Emily Harding Last revised: Tue 10 Oct 2006

Deleuze and Literature Conference Schedule

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.