Radio DelEuZe: Deleuze Studies | The English Research Institute

30.8.07

Deleuze Studies | The English Research Institute - Manchester Metropolitan University

==== The good people thinkers of multiplicities & other diVerSities at Manchester 're
cooking up an event which looks to be
interesting, thoughtful, gorgeous, sweet,
kind, generous, deterritorializing and
a smooth space of stratas tickled by their thumbs as the ghostlings of Professeur Challenger & others broadcast via
the persona of varied and sundry
telecasters ...====================
If there was a Tube to Manchester
from Canada we'd be there.....

Deleuze Studies | The English Research Institute - Manchester Metropolitan University: "This page is dedicated to the upcoming Deleuzian Event at Manchester Metropolitan University. The conference takes place on September 8th and 9th 2007. Keynote speakers include Ian Buchanan, Claire Colebrook and John Mullarky. Also for the first time we will be conducting a live streamed broadcast of the keynote papers on this website. Viewers will then be invited to e-mail questions to the speakers, which will be posed during the questions and answer sessions. Further details on this will appear on the website closer to the event. Image of Deleuze on website and this blog are by by Alan Hook..."

Follow the link listeners.

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.