Radio DelEuZe: THE BOOK 1: THE MOVEMENT-IMAGE

11.2.09

THE BOOK 1: THE MOVEMENT-IMAGE

from new Lights Press. this edition of the Movement Image oF ProFessor ChallEnger Deleuze. movies . movies. and books. indeed.it is so Do yOU agree Doctor Deleuze?

Yes yes, bien sur. Always. Tousjours.

everyone must make their own movie.
yes.
the reel to real.

________________________________
Text and images by Aaron Cohick-Gilles Deleuze
56 pages, softcover with printed dustjacket, double signature pamphlet stitch, 8” x 5”
Letterpress printed dustjacket and covers with digitally printed text pages
Edition of 50
2007

via

newlights press

___________________________________________
and over
here
video

'O gelo que se transforma em agua é o finito contido no infinito ou a imagem-tempo de Deleuze, que nao deixa de ser presente para tornar-se passado. É o etendo desenvolver e tornar a origem.//
Il ghiaccio che diventa l'acqua è il finito contenuto nel'infinito o l'immagine-tempo di Deleuze, che non smette di essere presente per diventare passato. È l'eterno svilupo e ritorno alla origine.'

___________________movies and makin g deterritorialzing the reel to electronic bits of song. THus
the Cry of the Molecule.

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.