Radio DelEuZe: Deleuze 's We(a)re and Wolves

26.2.09

Deleuze 's We(a)re and Wolves

_ Fine tuning over here and there on the world wide radio virtual technical and actual. A miraculating discourse of the theos of immanence and the deos of transcendance_ O trash Dendence! the fulsome refuse of body best below ___. the we(e) stepping as the ripping of the veil _ actual virtual immanence to swish its coat along the seven sins of reality

----- one Radio onE Two

we tuned into :

Je Est Un Autre
indeed Je is always un autre
un autre
un outre
d'autre

et voila
the discussion

as quoting here
and following there to pursue
listeners

"The last edition of Modern Theology carries an article by ‘No Werewolves In Theology? Transcendence, Immanence, And Becoming-Divine In Gilles Deleuze‘ by Jacob Sherman. I wish to make a few comments on the contents of the article, its reasoning and the general approach of articles such as this. A brief disclaimer - I am not a Deleuze scholar, "

Not a scholar! Indeed O sir A reader of passion and and and... orchiding bee...

( A writer of our kind! Not a scholar __ I recall that wonderous line in Dialogues... Professor Challenger: avoid the double shame of the scholar... Ah, oui tousjours le paradoxe de doubleture ....

My hamlet jacket double to myself rempli et

hamming my be or not to become along the Lagorgian forgian tracks

I am gorgias to your gorging ass of gorgeous buttocks flesh to my face billow to my clouding in-ness of earth beg....

"but I think I’ve got a fair grasp of the shape of his thought and the scholarship surrounding it. I have no particular interesting in defending Deleuze, though I am interested, for the sake of pure scholarship in the subjects I am involved with, in people making an attempt to read charitably and understand people’s thought in their own terms before critiquing it. It should be noted that despite what I am about to write, I actually did enjoy the article, it was amusing to see a description of mysticism and drug taking in the pages of Modern Theology, but I am convinced it is wrong on number of counts. It’s nothing personal, its strictly business and it was fun to write this."

(It's never personal!)

Mister Je est un autre continues:

The thesis of the article is thus:

"This essay adds a theological voice to the current" __ a current in the electric tape! a burning circuit! ___"debate over the legacy of Gilles Deleuze." Doctor Daddio Strikes again!_ the god with a theological fate!__ Saint Deleuze le Mystic! ____ " It discusses Peter Hallward’s charge that Deleuze is best read as a mystical, theophanic philosopher who values creativity to the detriment of real creatures. (!!!!!!)It argues that while Hallward is right to discern a flight from ????????????bodies,????????relations, and ?????????politics in Deleuze, ____this is due not to Deleuze’s contemplative mysticism, but rather to his strident rejection of any transcendence. ____The essay then draws upon Thomas Merton ___ O My God! Thomas Merton! the converted Catholic ! the pulling twogather Christian and Zen! the Resurrected Monk! ____ in order to argue that only a fully contemplative engagement with transcendence allows us to save the sort of radical becoming that Deleuze sought but couldn’t achieve.

Sounds like a grand rebuttal but itself is chalked with ideas of flight. Where does one detect a flight from politics bodies and relations in Doctor Daddio Deleuze? To moi, all flights traverse the versing bodies without organs of the full body wrapped in its carnalities. Concepts percepts affects all varia on the air-planes of consistencies.

O Challenger earth and readiness the speed of
eyes and earth swallow your temperment eyes
their terrible things flying ~ .

continuings here

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.