Radio DelEuZe: Finger oF SPeaCh

17.8.09

Finger oF SPeaCh

Just cause its a Finger of Speech dont .mean its not a machine. and not a figure of rhetoric. or rhetoric ought to be re-inscribed as a functioning cog of the literary machine. It spits out figures _ but figures that are alive are figures/flow _ points/signs . Being figural does not make them any less machinic.

but that does not mean the cogs and wheels, of figures are not inscribed
in machines

there are machines. everybuddy nosthis. yer radio is a machine.

so ________________ All metaphors are literal.

'Judge Schreber feels something, produces
something, and is capable of explaining the process theoretically. Something is
produced: the effects of a machine, not mere metaphors.-'A/O9-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As in Jesse Watkins Account of a Journey __ as recounted by Laing__ Laing remarks apropos of Watkins travelling backwards in time __ the recessive moment __ on a psychotic trip __ and the feelings he describes as not being mere metaphors.

What is the meaning of this distinction between two regions: one
molecular and the other molar; Mona the microdot ~one micropsychic or micrological_Jill's marriage micrological, the other

statistical and gregarious? ----------- Franny is into statistical her sex is fried in sunshine... not a metaphor __Is this anything more than a metaphor lending the
unconscious a distinction grounded in physics, when we speak of an opposition|||||||||| but her intratomic ass is winging it hot! mass~Baby!||||||||||||||||||||||

between intra-atomic phenomena and the mass phenomena that operate through
statistical accumulation, obeying the laws of aggregates?

-------O my aggregates and congregates!
&paragates~

But in reality the unconscious belongs to the realm of physics; the body without organs and its intensities are not metaphors, but matter itself. "
Doctor Einstein is that you winking in thee backer of the classroomsystole system?

|_________________________ It taint A Finger of Speaching Mona ~
|A/O The Molecular Unconscious (Intro to schizoanalysis) _ So that means a schizoanalysti-poet is a physicist_ and a savant ___ . Sounds like rimbaud! in his big old bad letter to Izambard, his old teacher, pretty sure that was his name _ the poet's gotta be a savant, a scholar, a this athat, a criminal, all kind of things, yet he didnt mention physics! so now we are ~ and why not become a geologist a historian a gynecologist too ~

Shes's Devenir caught in her cookies

________________
Oh its hot radio ~

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.