Radio DelEuZe: is this?

13.8.09

is this?

"What is this crap according to which there are professional philosophers, profesional artists? Does not philosophy belong to everyone ?

Does not Art belong to everyone? What does living means then, simply living, when one is a man and one is a prey to language

They are we writing as rhizome. Right handing lefthanding ____It is a rhizome cowboya Ritten baya rhyming labyrinth a shining,

glowin'

in thee darksome
--------------- Jil is darksome black and white. she's gone to her con-
versation
not her
ter
giversation

paths of collective democratizations...

the grass....

China___________________ which is next door to yer discourse ~

in medias res

In media rests

medial pause

other clause

It is composed of pllanes__ [this plane of love: a category forgotten by philos]...we watched lines leave one plateau and proceed to another like

column of tiny ants: are ants anything other than tiny?
are the thousand tinee sex?
tom thumb ~

We made circles of convergence_______________ Mona is vergin to her consistent flatteAU She has Water in Her LunElInesEach plateau can be read starting anywhere and can be relatedto any other plateau. To attain the multiple, one must have a method that effectively constructs it; no typographical cleverness,

Each Blogtoe every text, singular bodies of porous
pages. not Determine or pre-deterMine .
In other words not terminated
by any especial idea in advance of what a text
or an image

no lexical agility, ------------------------ NO? Says WHo Mister AppOlINaIRe?

O dear Doctor
Challenger was (no)blending or creation of words, no

syntactical boldness___________ we were bold as bread and brandy ~ _______________________________________

, can substitute for it. In fact, these are more often than not merely mimetic procedures used to disseminate or disperse a unity that is retained in a different dimension for an image book.Tree LogicTree “All tree logic is a logic of tracing and reproduction.

_________________s Rhizomatic Versus ArbolicRhizomatic

ArbolicNon-linear LinearAnarchic HierarchicNomadic

SedentarySmooth StriatedDeterritorialized

TerritorializedMultiplicitous Unitary and binaryMinor science

Major scienceHeterogeneity Homogeneity

(yet the two sets of claw
interlocking
as keys in a chain
asbeing becoming
as interfluted vowels
condensed monkeyS!)

perhaps I repeat
myself
but what the hell

Repetition & Difference
Repetition with the zero difference at its heart.

Stop. chop. Stop chop.

___________________________ Mister Radio has a zoom lens to click in yer schizo ppardonzz an poles. Yer poleadots. Microdot ~

_______________________________________ find the safe then throw the combination out the window ~

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.