Radio DelEuZe: So Mister and (Mrs Ligne de Fuite

14.8.09

So Mister and (Mrs Ligne de Fuite

Daddyio Deleuze was 'fraid of crazy folk. once at laBorder Clinique. he was there. meeting with Felix the Pierre with whom he was writing up a sotten storm called AntyOEdIpus, well some crazy person, some fou fou got off wandering the grounds,of that grand old largesse space they had and well bust his arse Guattari didn't blink and went about

his business looking for the at loose 'lunatic' when Doctori Deleuze heard that well he went Pale as a Ghost White as A Sheet. No w imagine that this body without organs swifting round like. I first of dear doctor fiund Schzios the finest of the crazies, the kindliest canniest smartest and least likely to hurt harm and hinder anynoone.

Now old Pierre he wasnt fraid of no schizos
and no mister catanonic deleuze
was neither
but the line
of flight at such speed
looped his scare wheels
right around him

didnt they?
dint they

dint they?
now

aw right yer a blighter
he was bloody scared he
was sure enough
by the lord bloody jesus
of immanence christ sake himself!

_______________________

and good old Laing
the grand Scottish
doctor
mending

here and
there

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.