Radio DelEuZe: yo u gotta

6.8.09

yo u gotta

You must contra _ dicta yer self.

mister you gotta you aint no genius. just a body walking 'side the things you love, the men, the women, the voices you never met, but heard the, down the long ocean's call, its lover troop ,
ship its waiting hopes, home

as tender as the fare, cuddling the lover's basked breath, the
unpronounceable word

you looked Mona
in the dictionary finding her lover
everywhere a hundred bodies

a thousand
and everything free
for

love

-_____________________
In this radio Jill's been becoming her nigh
waves naked toher cunt
placed high on the hill
love's body high on the niveau of its cussing and fussing
its low ridership

better than none
between the everything dozen nothing done ~

JIll won't serve the purser she is the purser

~ _______________
heel and tramp's the best living for you doctor ~

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.