Radio DelEuZe: la plainte et ...

9.9.09

la plainte et ...

_____________________________________

❝Non pas vouloir ce qui arrive, avec
cette fausse volonté qui se plaint
et se défend, et se perd en mimique,
mais porter la plainte et la fureur
au point où elles se retournent contre
ce qui arrive, pour dresser l’événement,
le dégager, l’extraire dans le concept
vivant. Devenir digne de l’événement,
la philosophie n’a pas d’autre but[…].

❝Nous ne manquons pas de communication,
au contraire nous en avons trop, nous
manquons de création. Nous manquons
de résistance au présent.

❝Partout des machines productrices ou désirantes, les machines
schizophrènes, toute la vie générique: moi et non-moi, extérieur et intérieur
ne veulent plus rien dire.

❝L’artiste ou le philosophe sont bien incapables de créer un peuple,
ils ne peuvent que l’appeler, de toutes leurs forces. Un peuple
ne peut se créer que dans des souffrances abominables, et ne peut pas
plus s’occuper d’art ou de philosophie. Mais les livres
de philosophie et les oeuvres d’art contiennent aussi leur somme
inimaginable de souffrance qui fait pressentir l’avènement
d’un peuple.

Ils ont en commun de résister, résister à la mort,
à la servitude, à l’intolérable, à la honte, au présent.❞

____________________________________________________

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.