Radio DelEuZe: planular perfect

16.9.09

planular perfect

planular The unconscious no longer designates the hidden principle of the transcendent plane of organization, but the process of the immanent plane of consistency as it appears on itself in the course of its construction. _______________________ --

Thousand Plateaus (p.284) perfect is fr the museum tzara said in 1918 dada manifesto

_________________________________> What image Sir? - the cocetti of 'removed' reproved remonstrate_ stratA_

who're you speakin?

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

If every ruin is a landscape surreal as a button, well it's time to button down, dump yer Baudrillard & back to Deleuze and Guattari's assmeblages, where desire's beauty lies, as a mouth opens.. to it, cupping up glances of moonlight, don't you think? it was a lon g gone year with yer ass up yer elbow now by Max Ernst that was true . single as any many. riant . as blutt? not so near the chinese counter player used the saxophone making her point savon ~ .

(0nce a missive now an apothegm)

Origin: 1545–55; earlier apothegma apóphthegma, equiv. to apophtheg- (var. s. of apophthéngesthai to speak out; apo- + phthéngesthai to speak) + -ma n. suffix

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.