Radio DelEuZe: of mic e ... men a t the movies with S and D

31.10.09

of mic e ... men a t the movies with S and D

Rare Comment by weirdblogger C. Duffy at Mister Shores Cinema Project which

said...

this post from Corry shores delight Deleuze Cinema project reblogified in cinemablogazine ici. thank you Corry

Having reposted the entire particular post here. __________________________Of Mice and Lead. Hawks. Scarface

presentation by Corry Shores

[The following is quotation]

Of Mice and Lead

Gilles Deleuze

Cinema I

Cinéma 1

Chapter 9. The Action Image: The Large Form

Chapitre 9. L’image-action : la grande forme

1. From situation to action: ‘secondness’

1. De la situation à l’action : la « secondéité »

the modes of behavior, however studied they are, are not true habits, true responses to situations, but conceal a fault or cracks which cause them to disintegrate. This is the story of Hawks’ Scarface, where all the hero’s cracks, all the little faults which made him take it too hard, converge in the appalling crisis to which he succumbs on the death of his sister. [Deleuze Cinema I 1986:149]

les comportements, si expérimentés soient-ils, ne sont pas de vrais habitus, de vraies réponses à des situations, mais recèlent une faille ou des fêlures qui les désintègrent. C’est l’histoire de « Scarface » de Hawks, où toutes les fêlures du héros, toutes les petites failles par lesquelles il en faisait trop, so réunissent dans une crise abjecte qui l’emporte avec la mort de sa sœur. [Deleuze Cinéma 1, 1985 :201]

Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image.Transl. Hugh Tomlinson & Barbara Habberjam, London: Continuum, 1986

Deleuze, Gilles. Cinéma 1: L'image-mouvement. Paris: Les éditions de minuit, 1983.

Image 1

http://www.afilmcanon.com/journal/2007/10/20/hawks-scarface-the-shame-of-a-nation-1932.html

Thank you Billy Stevenson

thank you Corry Shores

and Gilles Deleuze

Image 2

/movies.sky.com/review/rear-window-2

Thank you sheila.

Re:Posted here

by Radio Deleuze

___OF Mice and Men __________> OrIgiNal Post at there ___________________________

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.