Radio DelEuZe: Un nuit un siècle un jour . .. peut-etre....

29.11.09

Un nuit un siècle un jour . .. peut-etre....

Art and philosophy several jointed word several storied.

_________________________this way the face becomes the wall
but is it white? then
or the white wall's become the becomings face of walking the artist that stares?

what gift hearkens shakespearian perception of distance
and love's far wing ?

Camillo

:Sicilia cannot show himself over-kind to Bohemia.

They were trained together in their childhoods; and

>there rooted betwixt them then such an affection,

>which cannot choose but branch now. Since their

more mature dignities and royal necessities made

separation of their society, their encounters,

though not personal, have been royally attorneyed

with interchange of gifts, letters, loving

embassies; that they have seemed to be together,

though absent, shook hands, as over a vast, and

embraced, as it were, from the ends of opposed
winds. The heavens continue their loves!

ACT I

SCENE I. Antechamber in LEONTES' palace.

______________________A dream a brain walling a n artist his work tonight

«Un jour, peut-être, le siècle sera deleuzien.» Michel Foucault|||| this one reproduction from the Abode of Chaos Sets

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.