Radio DelEuZe: becoming sm a ll

6.2.10

becoming sm a ll

-------------------------------------------- Tune Prof Challenger. the world is flowd to its flawd fold.
in this fictional commentary Mona, who lost her mind ages ago, to say nothing about her ass and thighs fights a rear-guard action has no time for thought or relaps,e, replaces cephaleous with contrary daughter going both back way

___________________
becoming small, this text of yers... so interesting.... the way you link Alice and Artaud and the becomings small, the molecule and the body-without-organs. THe body without organs let me explain to some of our readers was a space of experience of death that Antonin Artaud the French poet wrote about .Since then its been transformed into a full fledged concept by the philosophers Deleuze and Guattari.

________Alice-Artaud became so small that he disappeared and was just a BWOa little molecule in an expanding space of the body as one shrinks andit becomes outer spacelike the wizard of oz -- I am not sure of this Wizard of Oz connection. but the ALice one is accurate. But this is only a comment en passant.one's skin becomes loose as one becomes smallerwhat the hell am i doing in here?can I reach the moon that is my brain?can i reach the sun that is now my ass?--- This last line puts me in mind of what Schreber as quoted by D&G. what the hell are all these fluidsand turning back to the Greeksone finds the elementsand nothing besidesa certain heightened awarenessyes, drunk on fluidityall we are doing is swimming in an ocean of plasmacan we sink?-- Embyronic adventures of the memory of the body decades afterward?

Interesting stuff...

and here in this group there is No Judgement of God, but only work.|Did she find the SignIFier

fuck>??????????????? that is the cockquery aint it?

______________

Out of memory loss she has come a shrewd doctor of
thing and witch-weed,eskimos there, or coyotes, or like elephants, or desiringmachines, copies of michel foucault, children in diapers, adults running around naked, italian hussies, greek clams, regional forests, dickens like characters running amok, other weird period pieces, lemon pie, cheese wrapped in gowns, tee birding fossils, verse in blank pages, blank verse in pages, pagination for cows, ringing horse bells? awful goodie two shoes?

meantime she take cloth off
ing clothing offing when write writin'

the cuff, cuffing it as it were,

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.