Radio DelEuZe: YUCkTUrd HolY FamBlEe

29.12.10

YUCkTUrd HolY FamBlEe

________________________________________First you betray Angelic
Doctor Deleuzy to BiG BaD AlAIn BadiOU!
and then the

christ!

mass! drivel! what sort of patois de schizophreni is that?

Now Mister D was that a lapse into the worst sort of boggy sentimentalism?

~~For Joseph will be travel-tired,~~

And Mary pale and wan,

And they can sleep a little while

Before they journey on ~.

________________

let s erase it

and write

the real

thing

the

empty triangle

a true

and his

wan

mary

was

buggerd

the empire

of the

spirit!

radio deleuze: Yuletide ~
_________________________Who shall hear this song drops dead in the marsh covering the swollen peat of ireland new foundering poverty!
__________________As for the Shakeascene well ya cant go wrong with his words so we ll tilt the show
therewards to the secret escapading silences of that plays dramatic finale!

Felix was absolutely riight! Now that monstroSity has to be deOeDiPalize and deterri

De Kerr

A Tized___________________________________

each pipe has to be purged a curetTagge!s vOuSplait!

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.