Radio DelEuZe: Colloque SpiNoZa DelEuZe ___

28.4.11

Colloque SpiNoZa DelEuZe ____ ParIs

Does your Paris

pause for Spinoza?

doctor desire

(Pause Kiss)

Now dig this ladies and gentlemen ~ in Paris

Colloque

SPINOZA – DELEUZE

Vendredi 29 et samedi 30 avril

Organisé par Anne Sauvagnargues et Pascal Sévérac

avec le soutien du CERPHI (ENS de Lyon - UMR 50 37) et du Ciepfc (ENS de Paris)

(dinner Kiss)

Vendredi 29 avril à l'ENS-Ulm

Matin: salle Jules Ferry

9h45: ouverture

10h00 - 10h45: Chantal Jaquet (Paris 1) : « “Un balai de sorcière” (Deleuze et la lecture de l’Ethique de Spinoza) ».

(holdling hands

left and right)

10h45 - 11h30: Pierre Zaoui (Paris 7): « L'immanence spinoziste: un coup de force deleuzien? ».

And Rimbaud
appears
from Aden
more
than
a 100 yrs late(r)

11h30 - 11h45 : pause

(lovers smile)

11h45 - 12h30: Laurent Bove (Université de Picardie Jules Verne) : « Spinoza-Deleuze et la question d’Autrui »

Après-midi: Amphi Rataud

(dinner kiss lunch to pleasure

to desire

)

14h30-15h15: Ariel Suhamy (La Vie des Idées): « Le cheval de labour et le cheval de course ».

15h15-16h00: Vincent Jacques (ENSAV): « De Différence et répétition à Mille plateaux, métamorphose du système à l'aune de deux lectures de Spinoza ».

16h00 - 16h15: pause

16h15 - 17h00: Pascal Sévérac (Collège International de Philosophie): « La sensation chez Spinoza et Deleuze: percept et affect ».

Samedi 30 avril à l'Université de Paris 1

Matin: salle Cavaillès

10h00 - 10h45: Charles Ramond (Paris 8 / LLCP): « Deleuze lecteur de Spinoza : la tentation de l’impératif ».

10h45 - 11h30: Antonio Negri: « Spinoza et Deleuze: le moment propice ».

11h30-11h45: pause

Eat then drink. then think. Think of the attributes.

11h45 - 12h30: Anne Sauvagnargues (Paris 10): « De l'interprétation à l'éthologie : les deux lectures de Spinoza par Deleuze ».

I have been reading reading Anne Sauvagnarques book ~

Après-midi: salle Cavaillès

14h30 - 15h15: Kim Sang Ong-Van-Cung (Université de Poitiers): « Le pouvoir d’être affecté – Modes spinozistes et singularités chez Deleuze ».

15h15 - 16h00: Thomas Kisser (Université de Munich) : « La réalité du penser. L’interprétation de Spinoza par Deleuze ».

16h00-16h15: pause

16h15 - 17h00: Igor Krtolica (ENS de Lyon): « Deleuze, Spinoza et les signes ».

____________________________ Bring your glasses ~

____________________

Hotel kiss

walkin ' kiss

Along the Seine river

Lovers lisp

Lovers body cry

_______________________I 've always been a beggar.

I am all the names in history

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.