Radio DelEuZe: ask yourself twice

9.14.2017

ask yourself twice

_________________

Now ask yourself twice did I really think what I thought I did, did I really pursue a new thought bending around some corner where the twice felled gods a(rose) and clambered past the mighty sheets of time and

self conceit not deceiving yourself into a generational arrogance what believes believing its own shit? its own wit,

its own bellicose drama

not an idea, at all in that instance,

but a namby pamby crybaby repetition of the same and copying someone else's ideas.

Not idears, or ideas, but Id eas what's that Id eas?

Plato stared at the cave long, and enough was past time it's reckoned second soup. Like Christ dying on the cross

right to the teeth his bones dying and crying out,

Lama Lama

and was Christ jesus the gesso goat? the pain of 5000 years of civilization dormant forgiving and reconciling itself,

Christ first messiah of the sun and the resurrection of all matter across the universe

not Jesus the certain identity of a person

but Christ, the Christ the Sign of a new Burst burned in the sun of Future Matter

and Metaphysical

across over the radiant hours of life of death of birth,

and forever going on

Incomprehensible future

forged in the anthropology of human life and destiny, as it was, this man of the future .

Eternal ripped in the becomings of forever

~

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

Radio DelEuZe

9.14.2017

ask yourself twice

Rene Scherer

CreAtIve ComOn