Radio DelEuZe: rad

9.12.05

rad

Doctor Deleuze are you?
is
there some station we are turning
tuned into our hands break
on the dial
station to station
operator this is a trunk call
to radio radio

son of genet radio genet
not your batteries or
burning black tubes
in the dark

here ?

is that there staring through
it the phosphorescent red
in the dark
the already read
night of communism and desire
desire communionism

treasure and wheel
trove heave ho
round your conceptual head
fitting the piece to your
earphone

clack clack
dear Doctor Nietzsche where is thy head

?

how? how else, the line of flight

assemblage break
in the night the 'mad' 'dark'
of edgar allan

majestic sentence of
mouth

.

Hear the hypnotized room .

'rapport' repose

___

ditididitidid di di di de de __ __--____

What is something bad?

as it works a cross the throat __ and the body ___ .

Hear the voice .

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.