Radio DelEuZe: MuTEual MaChIne Book Blog

30.4.07

MuTEual MaChIne Book Blog

Actually its not anylonger of a book but a Machine really its not a book at all it is a kind of machine not quite the idea of a desiremachine which only works when things break down but on the other hand it is a break through of genre and media to shaping so on so on.You Dig?
Like how does it end anD begin? You see what I mean?

This is a project of ______fun ~~~. This idea had been floating around my head for a while to start a series of mini-blogs, offshoots of the rhizomatic machining that differnedifferentiies __ the whole play against difference and perhaps ... the Differnet.t authors playing in the me/you dyad fling over, bend & shape materials of the electronic space in Other Way. Ya dee se to fly its resolute.

Call it novelty

---------------------------------------------------------------------

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.