Over Exposed:

from blogger

Oppermann in Praxis

(Gilles Deleuze 1925-1995, who ended his life by auto-defenestration)

This portrait of the late Deleuze has a much greater degree of repose than our current "existential image" of the young philosopher in his black coat, scarf and hat. Deleuze, by comparison is somewhat pathetically leaning to the left in our view of him. The wide open terror and possible menace ("what was it you wanted?" asks Bob Dylan) of Oppermann's face is a salutary counter to the listing image of Deleuze, overburdened by sickness and possible exhaustion with even having to bother with the incomprehension of the incomprehensible."

-------------------------

repose repose
take off your clothes
come in yer underwear
come in yer underclothes
come
with

a

Rose

Mister
DeLose
Mister
DeLouse
Mister
DeRose

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.

Radio DelEuZe

5.12.07

Over Exposed:

from blogger

Oppermann in Praxis

Search This Blog