Radio DelEuZe: he w.a s|JuxtaPosition

8.1.08

he w.a s|JuxtaPosition

what Prof. Challenger name assemblage /desire machine is juxtaposition in montage/ and other form of expression artvisual texting. so then | hemhem hum|gum|

------------

at D 'sssssseleuze's death, his colleague Jean-Francois Lyotard sent a fax to Le Monde, in which he wrote of his friend ...

....He was too tough to experience disappointments and resentments â€” negative affections. In this nihilist fin de siÃ¨cle, he was affirmation. Right through to illness and death. Why did I speak of him in the past? He laughed, he is laughing, he is here. It's your sadness, idiot, he'd say. ...^ J.-F. Lyotard, MisÃ¨re de la philosophie (Paris: GalilÃ©e, 2000), p. 194.

Tough? Rather smoothed by the plane of consistency . As carved wood.

Jill wonder thunder blunder .. wonder wonder how tough the tough's when the goin get rough

rough buff

god's buff 's Lear on the heath||||||||||

' 'The ideas we threw about like cottonwool or rubber balls he returned to us transformed into hard and heavy iron or steel cannonballs. We quickly learnt to be in awe of his gift for catching us red-handed in the act of cliche--mongering, talking rubbish, or loose thinking. He had the knack of translating, transposing. As it passed through him, the whole of worn-out academic philosophy re-emerged unrecognisable, totally refreshed, as if it has not been properly digested before. It was all fiercely new, completely disconcerting, and it acted as a goad to our feeble

minds and our slothfulness. ....

JIll hmmed her pants troubadour's whistle. Inthe pestle thistle gardene. Gardaren swine of her buttock lifting Moon

...What do you know about me, given that I believe in secrecy? ... If I stick where I am, if I don't travel around, like anyone else I make my inner journeys that I can only measure by my emotions, and express very obliquely and circuitously in what I write. ... Arguments from one's own privileged experience are bad and reactionary arguments ...

'
there rigour of hemmmmmmmmmmmed haauauauaughneste
----------------------

yes to non_philosopher

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.