Radio DelEuZe: thiS WonDerFul MoSaicos just

6.3.08

thiS WonDerFul MoSaicos just

_________________________________
so we rhizome linked around world holding hand

originally blogedby~~

Publicado por Rodrigo Sepúlveda en 17:30

thiS WonDerFul MoSaicos just

where there also be some fine JazZ~

across and around inteRnetting

A French philosopher says that since the fall of man we have ceased to intuit things in themselves. If the dictum is to have any reasonable meaning, he must have been thinking of the fall of man inthe Platonic sense, as stepping out of the absolute state. But in that case he should have put his dictum
inversely;
since we have ceased intuiting things in
themselves we are fallen beings.
For if the term
thing in itself
is to have any sense,
it can only signify something that is no
longer an object for us,
something that offers
no
resistance to our
activity...

Fredrich von Schelling
as quoted
by
Eric ALliez
in Capital Times

Heading Section Three
The Time of Novitas:
Saint Augustine

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.