Radio DelEuZe: lit

26.3.09

lit

"It is not the first two persons that function as the condition for literary enunciation; literature begins only when a third person is born in us that strips us of the power to say 'I' (Blanchot's 'neuter')" - Gilles Deleuze, "Literature and Life"

if it not like be d
the wh y
------------------------ fermez le I
q ui
_________________________________
______________________________________

for surely
its the other that

est deja a

utre

moments. ... At first I mistook it for passion,
for ecstasy. ... I thought I had found a living volcano, a female
Vesuvius. I never thought I had found a human ship going down in an
ocean of despair, in a Sargasso of impotence. Now I think of that black star

gleaming through the hole in the ceiling, that fixed star which hung above
our conjugal cell, more fixed, more remote than the Absolute, and I know it
was her, emptied of all that was properly herself: a dead black sun without
aspect."--------------------- A copperish glow like the face at the bottom of a black hole. The
point is to get out of it, not in art, in other words, in spirit, but in life, in real
life. Don't take away my power to love.

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.