Radio DelEuZe: narration beccomi g s

29.3.09

narration beccomi g s

sow i term of s uper ego s
it's what become of uncle he

he becom e exile from
his ow de s ire

-----------------------
there are gaps even between things that are
contiguous, gaps that are affirmations, pieces of a puzzle belonging not
to any one puzzle but to many, pieces assembled by forcing them into a
certain place where they may or may not belong, their unmatched edges
violently bent out of shape, forcibly made to fit together,

_______________

c'est l'e re[i]verse

Doctor Deleuze on America’s Griffith school of editing:

“It is wrong to criticize it as being subordinate to the narration; it is the reverse, for the narrativity flows from this conception of montage.”||||||||||||||||_________________________________________________

__________________||||||this chro os break there :

We are free to think
that there is finally even less dishonesty in psychoanalysis than in the established
literature

since the neurotic pure and simple produces a solitary work,

irresponsible, illegible, and nonmarketable, which on the contrary must pay not
only to be read, but to be translated and reduced

--------------------------------------------------

sHe makes at least an economic
error, an error in tact, and does not spread his values

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.