Radio DelEuZe: of merry

3.5.09

of merry

CCo
corcorcor
dialelelle et briske ....Boskage. head to toe. river wheat. come to the semiosis. it's radioheadland. between fm and am i am. what I am. What is I am? not a philosopher's cone. nor stone. to breakbeat. or come to . Come to what? believe its headache is snow. I am sitting inthe subjectivitie. its the land of fat plateaus the fourth circle. one might say. its plantain lane. or round the murray go roun' of banananas.

cocococo its the slip roun' the vessel. not the narcotic foursquare a day. but the dinnner of disjunction and belief. a man starred before now she starvesd with a famished machine. is it it it not sow?

come to her belief. thigh and pillow.

Complete asentence Doctor! where is the caliper callipyge I once knew? Jill screams mouthful!

-----Wear the blame.
----Con the sop.
----BEnd the crucifix!
-------Pleads for gawd's sake!

Get off the cross get off the face you asshole!

after the 'seminar' we went to dinner.
we got rid of all the neurotics
guilt ridden
weighs
killing
our becomings
.

with
infinite debted obligation ~

----

we turn to radio
heaveward to earth ship
shudder to keel
loving live our becomings
no matter how 'close to the butler edge'

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.