Radio DelEuZe: les rapports

27.7.09

les rapports

The passage from one flow to anothe

hen we speak of flows, it’s not to replace on

subject is not someone who is facing the flow GD: No. We know too well that a public sexuality, a commune sings the sun. repertitioning her petition. Beseech the beech. What fleece tears the coat she bear. She bear grizzly temporary maids huffed by cunning stowaways round her port. Not starboard to her thinged tip. Repeat. Repeat. Repear, shaving around the apple peel.

saying that it is the water that lacks the animal
GD: In a room where people are taking d

FG: It is all the same an incxample of the breast, or te lack of the dear Lord, and
RB: So you don’t thinsonally, I don’t like the term “secret” very much, and Gilles likesmediately taken up into a machine where no matter what he says is stifled in advance. It's chattering [mouline] in such a system that he is screwed in advance. You can speak, my boy, inIn the white tower she's held hang with king and sipping prince her piemory-screens.

GD: It's completely: Exactly. GD: No, not just anybody. But everybody. FG: Group-subjects GD: In

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.