Radio DelEuZe: does not

1.8.09

does not

One does not have to prove the Outside of monotheism and its craggy shape and conical fussiness. Just think of the Sumerian gods. anD theiR Love and Affair between thigh knee thunder cloud and god of love. An Essence is an God shaped something or Other. One makes a poem between the fars side of flung diction and the creation of realit. eeE . there are many gods. As Mouth to Zebra striped river.

Think of when we were in Africa Doctor Challenger. with the delta and savannah and the . infinite roll of .

what cannot be said. O the mouths abandoned by the river. of its awe sanctuary god.

I think of Dagon in this shiel of plate. Here hid by the obscure cover of its cracking rock. and the water the water spring pouring . callin calling ~ .

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.