Radio DelEuZe: D’une saisie de l’être : de Deleuze à Badiou

3.8.09

D’une saisie de l’être : de Deleuze à Badiou

On the radio we heard the voices that speak back to the desert. The island is freed of its enemies. the battles of philosophy are combattles, womb wars of the conception becoming, its incipient works a meadow to the passing, a field consistent with its conatus. As Mona finds her feet, her Challenger is desire. Always the immanent to itself and the mathesis is not the becoming of the stand stilltrip, but its mere glance alongthe passage of its rearing. So knocks the weight of fire and the polemos of Heraclitus and the rock clamber pavanne. Its truck the entrance to the secret corridor of thought, its Sophia the plinth love its acrylic base , the mud of press and leaf ~ .
__________________________________

Deleuze. « La Clameur de l’Etre », d’Alain Badiou, Hachette, coll. Coup double, 184 p., 95 FF.

"DIVERGENCE DES CHOIX ONTOLOGIQUES. S’élevant sur fond de l’échange épistolaire entretenu par Deleuze et Badiou entre 1992 et 1994, relatif à leur ontologie du multiple (virtualités intensives du Grand Animal Cosmique versus nombres actuels extensifs de la théorie des ensembles), le Deleuze. « La Clameur de l’Etre » d’Alain Badiou, loin de consonner avec l’image du penseur des machines désirantes, lanceur des lignes de fuite et prince des séries divergentes, en affronte le vitalisme sous l’angle qui le confronte à l’ontologie mathématique de L’Être et l’événement, à savoir au niveau de la saisie en univocité d’un Être adégalé à l’Un-Tout. Si toute philosophie se tient, selon les termes d’Alain Badiou, comme sous la dictée de la question de la pensée, de l’être et de leur liaison, l’ontologie événementielle déployée par Deleuze, tant au travers de postures conceptuelles (Spinoza, Leibniz, Nietzsche, Bergson...) que de figures artistiques (Proust, Beckett, Melville, Bacon....), se devra d’être appréhendée sous ce triple prisme d’une pensée de la pensée identique à l’être. Du côté de l’Être, la volonté de ne pas céder sur l’univocité d’un Être se disant en un seul et même sens d’étants actuels équivoques se voit sous-tendue par une pensée du continu dissolvant les partages catégoriels d’une représentation qui occulte le champ différentiel d’un Être neutre côtoyant le chaos."

__________________________ the complete essay

Véronique Bergen here

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.