Radio DelEuZe: often

22.11.09

often

Often you seem to be repeating yourself, in the fictions, and well, perhaps the other works as well. Is there a recurring obsession or is it a method, a working together of the two?

Yes, that's astute, it's sharp, It's true. The words and images, the phrasing even itself, every artist is like that... yes, dont you think?
After all we're creatures of our bodies, our situations, our loneliness and our solitude, our sense of being with others, and not being ..

You're obssessed with this idea o f the philosophers arent you? or nakedness in the body and its sexuality?

Hahha I notice you didnt name them! well, okay sure, I am but there are the characters, or personae that I see there as forces, or folds of a kind of bearing of intensity I carry in the world. for me the poems, and fictions especially are a
domain of freedom... and philosophy, well you know I am an artist and I work with these materials but I dont feel any ownership to them I love them of course, I love reading their work... and underlining it especially!

Well C Duffy and Clifford Duffy you're a funny man... I don't meant that in an insulting way.. this has been going on for a long time with you, hasn't it?

Some are born to strange delight some are born and some ... Well, I have that kind of mind that wanders...
and it wanders in and out of stories and figments of them. and anyhow, yes, I am the sort of endless digression of my own materials...

its quite late let's continue this tomorrow shall we?

O yes, of course natureally.

Anytime.

__________________________________________

Mister CDuffy and Clifford Duffy

scrummages as the tape recorder falls

on the floor...

I must hurry!

hurry

back to my tent!

its late

and the moon's gone

the stars are throbbing fibrillating and Im thinking about caressing buttocks.....

________________

________________________

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.