Radio DelEuZe: From Palestine to Parliament Hill: Canadian MPs report back from the West Bank and Gaza

21.1.10

From Palestine to Parliament Hill: Canadian MPs report back from the West Bank and Gaza | rabble.ca

Start: Jan 21 2010 - 7:30pm
End: Jan 21 2010 - 9:00pm

Location(s)

Oakham House, Ryerson University

63 Gould Street TTC: Dundas. Public parking on west side Church, south of Gould

Toronto, ON

Canada

See map: Google Maps

From Palestine to Parliament Hill:Canadian MPs report back from the West Bank Gaza

Public meeting
Thursday, January 21 at 7:30pm
Oakham House, 63 Gould Street, Ryerson University
TTC: Dundas | Public parking on west side of Church, south of Gould

Three Canadian MPs joined a Canadian-led delegation to the West Bank and Gaza from August 7 to 14, 2009 to document the living conditions of Palestinians, and to witness the devastation of Israel's war on Gaza. Please join us to hear them report their findings, and to discuss strategies for peace in the region.

Featuring:

Libby Davies
Member of Parliament for Vancouver East (New Democratic Party)

Richard Nadeau
Member of Parliament for Gatineau (Bloc Québécois)

Borys Wrzesnewskyj
Member of Parliament for Etobicoke Centre (Liberal Party)

Discussion will follow the MPs' presentations. All are welcome to participate.

Organized by:

Sam Gindin Chair in Social Justice and Democracy

Media sponsor:
rabble.ca

Endorsed by:
Canadian Arab Federation
Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid
Independent Jewish Voices
Not In Our Name
Palestine House
Ryerson Students' Union

To read the MPs' report, please visit: http://bit.ly/4Tk50b

For more information, please e-mail info@nowar.ca

From Palestine to Parliament Hill: Canadian MPs report back from the West Bank and Gaza | rabble.ca

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.