Radio DelEuZe: resumed notes ended

3.2.10

resumed notes ended

13. --with Stefan Czerkinsky: "Faces et surfaces" (discussion and six drawings by Deleuze) in Deleuze and Michel Foucault, Mélanges: pouvoir et surface (Paris: no publisher listed, 1973), pp.1-10. See below, 1994.2.

---------------------------noteS to Terrrrrrrrrrrribble unalogue ` 1. With Stefan Czerkinsky and J.-J. Passera, in Faces et Surfaces (Paris: Editions Galerie Karl Flinker, 1973). The occasion was the exhibition catalogue devoted to a young Polish artist whose work— monochrome compositions—remains unknown (the artist killed himself a little after the exhibit).

2. Six drawings by Deleuze, reproduced in Chimeres, no. 21, were part of the exhibit.

3. Concepts are not in your head: they are things, peoples, zones, regions, thresholds, gradients, temperatures, speeds, etc.

4. The border-hole and rhe margin-border are the two units of painting, among other things. The one can be understood as the territorializarion of the other, such that the other is then the deterritorialization of the one. But all of this is reversed when you walk around to the other side.

________________________________________________

Félix Guattari — vol 1 n° 21 - Hiver 1994 - 192 pages

Suely Rolnik, La dame en noir
Gilles Deleuze, Sept dessins
Michel Butel, Portrait d’un diable en 60 minutes
Charles Wolfe, Hallucination simplex
Félix Guattari, Tombeau pour un Œdipe
Club de La Borde, « Tes pierres de gué »
René Schérer, Subjectivités hors sujet
Gérard Soulier, Le philosophe est dans l’escalier
Nicolas Bourriaud, Le paradigme esthétique
Félix Guattari, Ecologie et mouvement ouvrier
Raymond Bellour, Les gens
Guy Trastour, Félix et les visiteurs
Anne Querrien, Cher Félix
Félix Guattari, Les machines architecturales de Shin Takamatsu
M. Elkaïm et I. Stengers, Du mariage des hétérogènes
Paul Virilio, Lettre à Félix
Pierre Lévy, Plissé fractal
Antonella Santacroce, Quando ti avvicinasti...
Claude Vivien, Fantaisie

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.