Francois Dosse speaking at

________________________One to go one gone ~ intersecting the lives of the orchid and bee ~ ____________________

Fri., Sept. 24, 4 p.m. “Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari: Intersecting Lives,” a German and Romance Languages and Literatures lecture by historian Francois Dosse. Co-sponsored by the Centre Louis Marin. 479 Gilman.

If yer at John Hopkins or in the neighbourhood this will be worthwhile hearing ~.

Lecture in French by François Dosse: « Deleuze et Guattari, un couple intellectuel singulier »

Harvard University Senior Common Room, Kirkland House, A-entry

85, Dunster Street, Cambridge

September 23rd at 6pm

Intellectual historian François Dosse will (have) gA(i)ve(n) a speech on the relationship and interactions between two major figures of the contemporary French intellectual world: philosopher Gilles Deleuze and psychotherapist Félix Guattari. After meeting in 1969, they produced several fundamental philosophic works together.

Dosse is professor at the IUFM Créteil, the Institut d’études politiques de Paris, and the Centre d’histoire culturelle des sociétés contemporaines de l’université Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines. He is the author of numerous books including a two-volume history of structuralism. Photo: Gilles Deleuze

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.

Radio DelEuZe

23.9.10

Francois Dosse speaking at

Lecture in French by François Dosse: « Deleuze et Guattari, un couple intellectuel singulier »

Search This Blog