Lorsque

(...) Lorsque la communication est établie entre séries hétérogènes, quelque chose passe entre les bords, des évènements éclatent, des phénomènes fulgurent, des sujets peuplent le système, moi passifs, sujets larvaires. (...) La différence dans l'intensité est l'objet de la rencontre, l'objet auquel la

rencontre élève la sensibilité. Ce qui est rencontré, ce sont les démons, puissances du saut, de l'intervalle, de l'intensif ou de l'instant, qui ne comblent la différence qu'avec du différent. (...)

(...) When communication is established between heterogeneous series, something goes on between the edges, events broke, phenomena dazzle, subjects populate the system, passive self, hopper

subjects. (...) The difference in intensity is the purpose of the meeting, the object which meeting

raises the sensitivity. What is met, are the demons, the powers of the jump, of the interval, of the intensive or of the instant, that bridge the difference only with the difference. (...)

( Gilles Deleuze - 1968 - Différence et répétition )

Daddio Deleuze's text

is quoted

jef safi

Joël-Evelyñ-François Dézafit-Keltz

at a flickr

page

where you can see

his photo & project

titled ~

lookıng ƒor a fuscum subnıgrum ontology . .

____________ __Tuning in the wave and plateau of pleats ~ connecting reconnecting d isconnecting ~

___________________

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.

Radio DelEuZe

26.10.10

Lorsque

lookıng ƒor a fuscum subnıgrum ontology . .

Search This Blog