Radio DelEuZe: expose the expository rule

15.10.10

expose the expository rule

Just a note brief however howsoever brief to its believing requesting the word? I am not a good

expository writer it takes me hours to pen to write even the simplest essays and what not

and really really O really?

(O wit would be a polemic)

So what I do really is what I write when I aint writing poetr y ,, as such is really ,, is
what I write
(watch those commas ) Deleterious as the page ~
is prose poetry a kind of ,,, poetry prose

so when I wrote about just before Corry Shore's Cinema work I could hardly gulp for writing as it does not come natural to me to

write an essay about
,,what I always write is a type of prose poetry ~ for what is expository writing to a writer like me but a way to remove myself from my 'best' subjects those internal to me

whereas I am moved by many others, I am moved by the beauty and intelligence of Pirate Corry Shores and his infinitely fine shores of learning beauty and learning as one alway does but I I must go about the long way round the

long way as round I go in
Artaud

S ow when writing this writing I write prose poetry as its exposition of the discursive is love's sheer body ~

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.