if it's Hegel reading Deleuze and D. (as in Deterritorialization) reading the first (H)
which comes first then? if
after is the beginning of the nothing that might be the void? and if the repetition of the difference is the
leaping in the present _rather along the Kierkegaardian ( there's a phrase I can't ... it's not remembering itself to me )
notion of the different different (the eternal return of the variation) , at this junction then then then then then then then is Hegel seeing Deleuze's seeing seeing seeing seeing seeing seeing Seen Seen Seen
eyes through the text of its partial totality or its near incomplete totality?
__________________ questions to be resumed ________as We and They continue our research
our intuitive grasping of the general beyond beginning
the fireworks of the dialectic? Is it Socrates returned to spite Nietzsche whose own frustrated readings of
Plato/Socrates led him to false conclusions and polemics .
Such as Socrates being ugly had to do with the dialectic than Xanthippe had taught him?
and wherefore Nietzsche's hatred of ugliness?
He stands the high ground so called of what he presupposed was the hatred of Athenians to the Socratic dialectic because of his ugliness
Strange salad Nietzsche concocts! that Sartre laughs off! as he too was an 'ugly' man with a wandering
eye (in more ways than one) and yet riveted the world with
his existential glance .
O my Nietzsche
O My Hegel who he hated
O my Deleuze searching for the difference undermining the dialectic in the Spinoza? whirlpool?
Let's not get the numbers down reducing one to the other.
_____________________ S(if)O were Deleuze reading (RT DT?) Hegel and it hits with a flash! the Zzzt!
________________________________________________ Bingo pang_____________________
indeed it must be .
_________________what if philosophy went on strike?
And Sartre taught it was notions and not concepts that constituted the philosophical creation.
So if we were to construct philosophy of the kind that interests us
in a sort of schema
there would be
dating back to Kant
and the several lines which follow from those two:
Mona once knew it was the existential-phenomenological versus the let's say on the other corner
the thinkers of becoming (which in a sense goes back to Heraclitus )
(So Badiou hails from the line of Parmenides and his opposites)
from our friend Heraclitus
_____________ Nota bene : deterritorialization is not identical to deconstruction. The latter is mostly one philosophical moment where as a deterritorialization is always accompanied by a reterritorilization .