because a thinker's born many times/ he's born in the work of other people/ and sometimes centuries apart
But philosophers are not born but reborn . See Plato: the philosopher's soul is reborn every ten thousand years. Which is why Plato could have read Deleuze reading Hegel . Simultaneous Karmic incarnation?
Gilles Deleuze, CoCOCOCCOCOCCOCauthor of Anti-Oedipus, would have been 91.
_________However it's a fun idea it does not add up as Philosophers can never 'could have .'
Philosophers are always
think of the platonic vaccum ___ versus the cave?
_________________and you see Sartre talked about philsophical epochs and that one could not think outside of those epochs and that if you tried you'd only be going backwards or end up repeating what's been said/
Interesting don't you think? so what Epoch's Deleuze ....hahhaha O yes hands fluttering in the air oh yeah there's that funny it's a reference ot that funny remark about our this century (which was t he 20) (now over) being a Deleuzian one
that's a referral to a kind of epoch or a proper name as guattari and deleuze like to call it
but epoch says more and less
and it hints at the word Epoke which I believe is term in Husserl but how it's used I am not familiar with but
I betcha it has something to do with time and the phenomena of time's multiple eclipse
riff riff but here the epoch is what then ? what episteme are we locking into or reckoned by?
as it s a kind of velocity machine a clock and some thing like a flow all at the same time
A geology machine you see and a liquid form of the full body of the earth? that ever creating self creating mass of rotund being and becoming?
well thinking's always made at the time it's made and it's whereabouts in that sense are never known but always to
found or explained and explained in the best sense as revealing or opening hidden edifices in our brain which
block us from seeing and thinking new ideas and perceptions and awarenesses and consciousnesses
and then there's all these dictators of deleuze's ideas going around commanding attention hither and yon
and some are authentic and breaking new ground but others are just boring and at times perpertrared by paranoiacs who really know nothing about thought and have not disciplined themselves
or studied in any way but are carving niches?
I'm not sure really but they're not throwing lassoes out to new ideas I mean new thought
BUt back to this idea that Deleuze would have been 91 etcetera
It's not true and it's not likely for one he was very sick and had to die when he did
the person the body died yes and is what it was at the time
But for thought Deleuze never died Nor did he He just Jumped on the boat
getting to the other side continuing his ideas
in what soever immanent fold of things
that suited him
and there were others there to greet him
probably Spinoza at the window
and Guattari at the Door
So Deleuze never died