Gilles Deleuze, Co-author Co-Author Co-Author Co-Author of Anti-Oedipus, would have been 91 and

 because a thinker's born many times/ he's born in the work of other people/ and sometimes centuries apart

 But philosophers are not born but reborn . See Plato: the philosopher's soul is reborn every ten thousand years. Which is why Plato could have read Deleuze reading Hegel .  Simultaneous Karmic incarnation?

Gilles Deleuze, CoCOCOCCOCOCCOCauthor of Anti-Oedipus, would have been 91. 


_________However it's a fun idea it does not add up as Philosophers can never 'could have .' 


  Philosophers are always 

  • ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||\

     think of the platonic vaccum ___ versus the cave?


    _________________and you see Sartre talked about philsophical epochs and that one could not think outside of those epochs and that if you tried you'd only be going backwards or end up repeating what's been said/

    Interesting don't you think? so what Epoch's Deleuze ....hahhaha O yes hands fluttering in the air oh yeah there's that funny  it's  a reference ot that funny remark about our this century (which was t he 20) (now over) being a Deleuzian one

     that's  a referral to a kind of epoch or a proper name as guattari and deleuze like to call it
      but epoch says more and less
       and it hints at the word Epoke  which I believe is  term in Husserl but how it's used I am not familiar with but

     I betcha it has something to do with time       and the phenomena of time's multiple eclipse

       riff riff  but here the epoch is what then ? what episteme are we locking into or reckoned by?
      as it s   a kind of velocity machine a clock and some thing like a flow all at the same time

    A  geology machine you see and a liquid form of the full body of the earth? that ever creating self creating mass of rotund being and becoming?

      well thinking's always made at the time it's made and it's whereabouts in that sense are never known but always to

    found or explained and explained in the best sense as revealing or opening hidden edifices in our brain which 
      block us from seeing and thinking new ideas and perceptions and awarenesses and consciousnesses

    and then there's all these dictators of deleuze's ideas going around commanding attention hither and yon

                      and some are authentic and breaking new ground but others are just boring and at times perpertrared by paranoiacs who really know nothing about thought and have not disciplined themselves
    or studied in any way   but are carving niches?

    I'm not sure really but they're not throwing lassoes out to new ideas I mean new thought

     BUt back to this idea that Deleuze would have been 91 etcetera 

                    It's not true and it's not likely for one he was very sick and had to die when he did
     the person the body died   yes and is what it was at the time

                       But for thought Deleuze never died Nor did he He just Jumped on the boat
                                        getting to the other side continuing his ideas 
                                                  in what soever immanent fold of  things 
                                      that suited him

                                                    and there were others there to greet him 
                                                                                     probably Spinoza at the window

                                                                                 and Guattari at         the       Door

                               So Deleuze  never died