________________________________________
It's Dialectic
not dialiectics!
(that spelling resembles some thing from hermeneutic!)
Duffy you a re so undialectical you can't even write it!
Anyhow, dialectics it's like Oedipus ___ now that echoes the AntiOedipus statement
That Oedipus blocks off the flows of the unconscious factory turning it into a theatre.
Similarly Tzara is against dialectics because it ends up proving what it already knew____________________________________> what does that mean? Does that mean that all of dialectics is useless or that Oedipus is useless ? __________________> No it does
not mean
that ___ to me what it becomes is this: How useful are these things?
It goes back to functions and juxtaposition_______________>
How can something be useful and productive in the sense of the unconscious factory being the maker and ___
and not just the recipient of an Oedipal apparatus of triangulation ____
So Dialectics_________________ as function okay but as truth creator as totalizer non.
Non merci!
That Oedipus blocks off the flows of the unconscious factory turning it into a theatre.
Similarly Tzara is against dialectics because it ends up proving what it already knew____________________________________> what does that mean? Does that mean that all of dialectics is useless or that Oedipus is useless ? __________________> No it does
not mean
that ___ to me what it becomes is this: How useful are these things?
It goes back to functions and juxtaposition_______________>
How can something be useful and productive in the sense of the unconscious factory being the maker and ___
and not just the recipient of an Oedipal apparatus of triangulation ____
So Dialectics_________________ as function okay but as truth creator as totalizer non.
Non merci!
_______________________________ Mister Duffy learns to
spell his dialect soup
of ideas and things
_____________________________________________
Create your own patois of ideas
be a maker of machines
_____________/ does it work? that's the question
