Radio DelEuZe: So then______ what are the fictions of d & g?

8.4.11

So then______ what are the fictions of d & g?

Jill readies her dialectical lasso ~

Layer on layer the celtic wheel. the bogswamp. the layered cake

__________________________Pretences and conceits (concetto). (A) re(:) collect 'f literary fuges. Notting. Hamfigures, tines ,, flines of light . Flight.

fictions of deleuze and guattari is a biography that escapes,

flows and becomes, runs, wheels and steals mingling fiction, fact,

literary codexing, allusion, things, objects, persons, genders, stratas,

becomings, speculations, translation, footnotes, hyper text, image,

recording, audio downloading, bibliographies which terminate nowhere,

picture and drawings, sex story escapades, formulas for revolution,
Deleuzoguattarian trivia, false leads to dead questions, personal

revelations, endless photos of form and content versus expression and the

__________________________________________________

Father; the secret love letters of Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze and

Guattari;pictures and tales of Claire Parnet; inter views with the children of the

famous Rhizomater; schizz flows and flowers with Felix and Franny in their

walk through the tunnel of love; remarkable moments with the analyst and

his patients, secret recordings of Guattari and his lover differance;
conferences with Guattari and the secretive Toni Negri; a brief moment
when Genet meets Guattari; Simone de Beauvoir and becoming Cixous not
Sixous; Sixeee and the Banshees do the Rhizome dance and the Screens fall

________________________Hagiographical Fictives__________epistemes of desire and moment______________ Watch the amazing Yffud D. climb her level best to lovermeanting lipskisssweep her amazing . What suedes of coat is that she? would she narrow her fend then? yet

speak english to her claim.

what slup is thus ? her buttocks blues as . chain her fallow. fellow women to the rug of torment.Is this her that witches? it so?

(sandwhichs provided)

Some flicking whipping and flogging would do you gooD!

Out you go MissDeleouse.

____________________________

~~Appendices~~ ApParent(ly) next time.

the most sensual is the back

if you see what I mean

Body without organs!

________________Corps sans organes?

Kipper me.

The 'charactes' are becomings ... affects... particles... singularities...

fictive cuts

.... this place of (plane) consistence consiting including

' fogs .... voids... plagues..

suspensions... vacuoles... jumps,

immobilizations.... hastes of...

fen...s.... pens... airs... particles...

winds of vacuum ... deeds of void

winds of intensity finger...

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

And : The question of speed is important and also very complex. It doesn't mean the first in the race: you can be late through speed. Speed is to be caught in a becoming_ which is not a development or an evolution. One must be like a taxi, queue(ligne d'attente), line of flight, traffic jam, bottleneck, green and red lights, slightly paranoid,brushes with the police. To be an abstract and broken line, a zigzag which glides 'between'. The grass and speed. What you misnamed style just now_ charm or style_ is speed.

And :One only discovers worlds through a long, broken flight.

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a question of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor D Challanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

How else?

How else can one write of those things which one doesn't know, or knows badly? It is precisely here that we imagine having something to say. We write only at the frontiers of our knowledge, at the border which separates our knowledge from our ignorance and transforms the one to the other.
Only in this manner are we resolved to write. To satisfy ignorance is to put off writing until tomorrow -or rather, to make it impossible. Perhaps writing was a relation to silence altogether more threatening that that, which is supposed to entertain with death.
_______________________

Difference and Repetition.